Reorienting Cosmo-Global Education: The OECD, Derrida, and the Hospitality of Thinking

E. Williams
{"title":"Reorienting Cosmo-Global Education: The OECD, Derrida, and the Hospitality of Thinking","authors":"E. Williams","doi":"10.7571/ESJKYOIKU.13.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent introduction by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development of the notion of ‘global competence’ appears to install cosmopolitan understanding at the heart of education across the globe. Yet how far does the OECD notion, and the broader models of global education it means to stand for, consolidate a picture that fails to do justice to the complex nature of human interpersonal and intercultural ethics? In this paper, I draw out limitations in the OECD notion of global competence and its recommendations for educational practice. Through an exploration of Jacques Derrida’s thinking on the theme of hospitality, I try to give substance to the critical destabilisation of the philosophical assumptions on which the OECD picture depends. Existing attempts to utilise Derrida’s philosophy in relation to questions of politics and education can rely on sensational language to do too much of the argumentative work. I approach Derrida’s thinking on hospitality via certain narratives, including scenes from Nobel Prize-winning novelist J.M. Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians. I then consider Derrida’s painstaking consideration of the nature of our lives in language to further develop the idea that hospitality involves a displacement of the self. These lines of thought, I conclude, suggest alternative possibilities for political education to those currently recognised in predominant discourses. They reveal how practices of writing, reading, and study in the humanities can provide a richer and more robust means of developing the receptivity of thinking called for by cosmo-global education.","PeriodicalId":205276,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies in Japan","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies in Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7571/ESJKYOIKU.13.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent introduction by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development of the notion of ‘global competence’ appears to install cosmopolitan understanding at the heart of education across the globe. Yet how far does the OECD notion, and the broader models of global education it means to stand for, consolidate a picture that fails to do justice to the complex nature of human interpersonal and intercultural ethics? In this paper, I draw out limitations in the OECD notion of global competence and its recommendations for educational practice. Through an exploration of Jacques Derrida’s thinking on the theme of hospitality, I try to give substance to the critical destabilisation of the philosophical assumptions on which the OECD picture depends. Existing attempts to utilise Derrida’s philosophy in relation to questions of politics and education can rely on sensational language to do too much of the argumentative work. I approach Derrida’s thinking on hospitality via certain narratives, including scenes from Nobel Prize-winning novelist J.M. Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians. I then consider Derrida’s painstaking consideration of the nature of our lives in language to further develop the idea that hospitality involves a displacement of the self. These lines of thought, I conclude, suggest alternative possibilities for political education to those currently recognised in predominant discourses. They reveal how practices of writing, reading, and study in the humanities can provide a richer and more robust means of developing the receptivity of thinking called for by cosmo-global education.
重新定位宇宙-全球教育:经济合作与发展组织,德里达,和好客的思想
经济合作与发展组织最近引入了“全球能力”的概念,似乎把世界性的理解置于全球教育的核心。然而,经合组织的概念,以及它所代表的更广泛的全球教育模式,在多大程度上巩固了一幅未能公正对待人类人际关系和跨文化伦理的复杂本质的图景?在本文中,我提出了经合组织全球能力概念的局限性及其对教育实践的建议。通过对雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)关于好客主题的思考的探索,我试图为经合组织图景所依赖的哲学假设的关键不稳定性提供实质内容。现有的试图利用德里达的哲学来解决政治和教育问题,可能会依赖于煽情的语言来做太多的论证工作。我通过一些特定的叙述,包括诺贝尔奖得主小说家J.M.库切的《等待野蛮人》中的场景,来接近德里达对待客之道的思考。然后我考虑德里达在语言中对我们生活本质的艰苦思考,以进一步发展好客涉及自我置换的想法。我的结论是,这些思路为政治教育提供了替代目前主流话语所认可的可能性。它们揭示了人文学科的写作、阅读和学习实践如何能够提供一种更丰富、更有力的方式来发展世界全球化教育所要求的思维接受能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信