Effect of Mud Weight on Hole Cleaning During Oil and Gas Drilling Operations Effective Drilling Approach

K. Igwilo, E. Okoro, P. N. Ohia, Solomon A. Adenubi, N. Okoli, Temilade Adebayo
{"title":"Effect of Mud Weight on Hole Cleaning During Oil and Gas Drilling Operations Effective Drilling Approach","authors":"K. Igwilo, E. Okoro, P. N. Ohia, Solomon A. Adenubi, N. Okoli, Temilade Adebayo","doi":"10.2174/1874834101212010014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A good hole cleaning operation is an important factor for every successful drilling program. Drilling mud should be formulated to suspend and transport cuttings effectively to minimize the number of drill cuttings in the hole. It is therefore, essential to determine the best weighing material that would be incorporated into the drilling mud for efficient hole cleaning given the well’s condition and formation type. Methods: This work is aimed to provide a detailed comparative analysis on the effect of drilling mud weight, using different concentrations of barite and calcium carbonate as weighing materials to determine optimum materials for hole cleaning. Results and Discussion: The results show that barite gave a lower annular pressure drop and therefore, a better Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD) compared to calcium carbonate, though, calcium carbonate gave better results in terms of transport efficiency and cutting concentration compared to barite. Conclusion: Barite is highly applicable in high-pressure reservoirs and calcium carbonate is applicable in depleted reservoirs. It can also serve as a bridging agent and can be used in reservoirs where it is necessary to minimize formation damage.","PeriodicalId":377053,"journal":{"name":"The Open Petroleum Engineering Journal","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Petroleum Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874834101212010014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction: A good hole cleaning operation is an important factor for every successful drilling program. Drilling mud should be formulated to suspend and transport cuttings effectively to minimize the number of drill cuttings in the hole. It is therefore, essential to determine the best weighing material that would be incorporated into the drilling mud for efficient hole cleaning given the well’s condition and formation type. Methods: This work is aimed to provide a detailed comparative analysis on the effect of drilling mud weight, using different concentrations of barite and calcium carbonate as weighing materials to determine optimum materials for hole cleaning. Results and Discussion: The results show that barite gave a lower annular pressure drop and therefore, a better Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD) compared to calcium carbonate, though, calcium carbonate gave better results in terms of transport efficiency and cutting concentration compared to barite. Conclusion: Barite is highly applicable in high-pressure reservoirs and calcium carbonate is applicable in depleted reservoirs. It can also serve as a bridging agent and can be used in reservoirs where it is necessary to minimize formation damage.
油气钻井作业中泥浆比重对井眼清洁的影响
良好的井眼清洁作业是每一个成功钻井作业的重要因素。钻井液的配制应能有效地悬浮和输送岩屑,以尽量减少井中钻屑的数量。因此,根据井况和地层类型,确定钻井泥浆中的最佳称重材料,以实现有效的井眼清洁是至关重要的。方法:采用不同浓度的重晶石和碳酸钙作为称量材料,对钻井液比重的影响进行了详细的对比分析,以确定井眼清洁的最佳材料。结果与讨论:结果表明,与碳酸钙相比,重晶石具有更低的环空压降,因此具有更好的等效循环密度(ECD),尽管碳酸钙在输送效率和切割浓度方面优于重晶石。结论:重晶石适用于高压储层,碳酸钙适用于衰竭储层。它还可以作为桥接剂,在需要将地层损害降到最低的油藏中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信