Improving Fuel Economy Estimates on a Chassis Dynamometer Using Air Conditioner Correction Factors

J. Reyes, E. Quiros
{"title":"Improving Fuel Economy Estimates on a Chassis Dynamometer Using Air Conditioner Correction Factors","authors":"J. Reyes, E. Quiros","doi":"10.1115/es2019-3821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Carmakers, regulatory agencies, and consumers share an interest in accurately determining a vehicle’s fuel efficiency under operating conditions that match the expected use. Previous studies have shown that a vehicle’s air conditioning (A/C) system is the most energy-intensive non-propulsive system and significantly reduces fuel economy.\n This study aims to design and validate a new method of improving fuel economy estimates obtained on non-climate-controlled chassis dynamometers, as such laboratories are limited to measuring fuel economy with the A/C system deactivated. The methodology proposed herein uses a chassis dynamometer to measure the fuel economy penalty caused by the A/C system at different steady-state conditions. The hypothesis is that these penalties can be imposed accordingly for a given drive cycle to obtain an additional fuel consumption due to A/C.\n To validate the proposed methodology, a vehicle was outfitted with a data acquisition system and was driven 50 times around a predefined route using varying A/C settings. The proposed method was then used to estimate the additional fuel consumption due to A/C usage for each of the runs. Comparing the calculated and actual fuel economies showed an average error of 1.924%. It was concluded that the proposed methodology is a viable alternative to existing procedures.","PeriodicalId":219138,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2019 13th International Conference on Energy Sustainability","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME 2019 13th International Conference on Energy Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/es2019-3821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carmakers, regulatory agencies, and consumers share an interest in accurately determining a vehicle’s fuel efficiency under operating conditions that match the expected use. Previous studies have shown that a vehicle’s air conditioning (A/C) system is the most energy-intensive non-propulsive system and significantly reduces fuel economy. This study aims to design and validate a new method of improving fuel economy estimates obtained on non-climate-controlled chassis dynamometers, as such laboratories are limited to measuring fuel economy with the A/C system deactivated. The methodology proposed herein uses a chassis dynamometer to measure the fuel economy penalty caused by the A/C system at different steady-state conditions. The hypothesis is that these penalties can be imposed accordingly for a given drive cycle to obtain an additional fuel consumption due to A/C. To validate the proposed methodology, a vehicle was outfitted with a data acquisition system and was driven 50 times around a predefined route using varying A/C settings. The proposed method was then used to estimate the additional fuel consumption due to A/C usage for each of the runs. Comparing the calculated and actual fuel economies showed an average error of 1.924%. It was concluded that the proposed methodology is a viable alternative to existing procedures.
利用空调修正系数改进底盘测功机的燃油经济性估算
汽车制造商、监管机构和消费者都对准确确定车辆在符合预期使用条件下的燃油效率感兴趣。先前的研究表明,车辆的空调系统是最耗能的非推进系统,并显著降低燃油经济性。本研究旨在设计和验证一种新方法,以改善在非气候控制底盘测力机上获得的燃油经济性估计,因为此类实验室仅限于在a /C系统停用时测量燃油经济性。本文提出的方法是利用底盘测功机来测量空调系统在不同稳态条件下的燃油经济性损失。假设是,这些惩罚可以在给定的驾驶循环中相应地施加,以获得由于a /C而产生的额外燃料消耗。为了验证所提出的方法,车辆配备了数据采集系统,并使用不同的空调设置在预定路线上行驶了50次。然后使用所提出的方法来估计由于每次运行的空调使用而产生的额外燃料消耗。计算结果与实际燃油经济性比较,平均误差为1.924%。结论是,拟议的方法是现有程序的可行替代办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信