Thucydides as Prospect Theorist

Josiah Ober
{"title":"Thucydides as Prospect Theorist","authors":"Josiah Ober","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1431169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opposing the tendency to read Thucydides as a strong realist, committed to a theory of behavior that assumes rationality as expected utility maximization, Ned Lebow and Clifford Orwin (among others) emphasize Thucydides’ attentiveness to deviations from rationality by individuals and states. This paper argues that Thucydides grasped the principles underlying contemporary prospect theory, which explains why people over-weight potential losses. Thucydides offers salient examples of excessive risk-aversion and excessive risk-seeking by decision-makers variously faced with high or low probabilities of losses or gains. Thucydides shows that leaders’ rhetoric can limit or exacerbate the political effects of bias in risk assessment.","PeriodicalId":397807,"journal":{"name":"Political Theory: History of Political Thought eJournal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Theory: History of Political Thought eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1431169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Opposing the tendency to read Thucydides as a strong realist, committed to a theory of behavior that assumes rationality as expected utility maximization, Ned Lebow and Clifford Orwin (among others) emphasize Thucydides’ attentiveness to deviations from rationality by individuals and states. This paper argues that Thucydides grasped the principles underlying contemporary prospect theory, which explains why people over-weight potential losses. Thucydides offers salient examples of excessive risk-aversion and excessive risk-seeking by decision-makers variously faced with high or low probabilities of losses or gains. Thucydides shows that leaders’ rhetoric can limit or exacerbate the political effects of bias in risk assessment.
修昔底德作为前景理论家
Ned Lebow和Clifford Orwin(以及其他一些人)反对将修昔底德解读为一个强有力的现实主义者,致力于将理性假设为预期效用最大化的行为理论,他们强调修昔底德对个人和国家偏离理性的关注。本文认为修昔底德掌握了当代前景理论的基本原理,这解释了为什么人们会过度重视潜在的损失。修昔底德提供了过度风险厌恶和过度风险寻求的突出例子,决策者面临着各种高或低的损失或收益可能性。修昔底德表明,领导人的言辞可以限制或加剧风险评估中偏见的政治影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书