{"title":"Thucydides as Prospect Theorist","authors":"Josiah Ober","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1431169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opposing the tendency to read Thucydides as a strong realist, committed to a theory of behavior that assumes rationality as expected utility maximization, Ned Lebow and Clifford Orwin (among others) emphasize Thucydides’ attentiveness to deviations from rationality by individuals and states. This paper argues that Thucydides grasped the principles underlying contemporary prospect theory, which explains why people over-weight potential losses. Thucydides offers salient examples of excessive risk-aversion and excessive risk-seeking by decision-makers variously faced with high or low probabilities of losses or gains. Thucydides shows that leaders’ rhetoric can limit or exacerbate the political effects of bias in risk assessment.","PeriodicalId":397807,"journal":{"name":"Political Theory: History of Political Thought eJournal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Theory: History of Political Thought eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1431169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Opposing the tendency to read Thucydides as a strong realist, committed to a theory of behavior that assumes rationality as expected utility maximization, Ned Lebow and Clifford Orwin (among others) emphasize Thucydides’ attentiveness to deviations from rationality by individuals and states. This paper argues that Thucydides grasped the principles underlying contemporary prospect theory, which explains why people over-weight potential losses. Thucydides offers salient examples of excessive risk-aversion and excessive risk-seeking by decision-makers variously faced with high or low probabilities of losses or gains. Thucydides shows that leaders’ rhetoric can limit or exacerbate the political effects of bias in risk assessment.
Ned Lebow和Clifford Orwin(以及其他一些人)反对将修昔底德解读为一个强有力的现实主义者,致力于将理性假设为预期效用最大化的行为理论,他们强调修昔底德对个人和国家偏离理性的关注。本文认为修昔底德掌握了当代前景理论的基本原理,这解释了为什么人们会过度重视潜在的损失。修昔底德提供了过度风险厌恶和过度风险寻求的突出例子,决策者面临着各种高或低的损失或收益可能性。修昔底德表明,领导人的言辞可以限制或加剧风险评估中偏见的政治影响。