A comparative study on methods for evaluation of lightning impulse parameters

S. Venkatesan, P. Vanaja Ranjan, D. Ashokaraju
{"title":"A comparative study on methods for evaluation of lightning impulse parameters","authors":"S. Venkatesan, P. Vanaja Ranjan, D. Ashokaraju","doi":"10.1109/TENCON.2003.1273183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The parameters of lightning impulse (LI) can be determined as per IEC-60/IEEE-4 standard, if the shape of the impulse is smooth. However, difficulties arise if the oscillations or overshoot are superimposed on the waveform. If the frequency of such oscillation is greater than 0.5 MHz or the duration of overshoot is less than 1 /spl mu/sec, it is essential to determine the mean curve for evaluating LI Parameters. In this work, two approaches in evaluating the mean curve are extensively analyzed. The first approach is based on multiresolution signal decomposition. This technique uses the wavelet transform, where a dyadic-orthonormal function decomposes the signal into a smooth and detailed version of the original signal. After removing high frequency components from detailed signal, the mean curve of the impulse waveform can be reconstructed. The second approach is based on mathematical curve fitting where smooth or oscillating impulse is represented by a non-linear impulse waveform equation, representing a double exponential function with sine and cosine terms and Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm is used to minimize least mean square error. The merits and demerits of the above two methods are compared and analyzed. Case studies involving the standard lightning impulse (SLI), lighting impulse with front oscillations (LIFO), with peak oscillations (LIPO), impulse with long duration overshoot (LILDO), impulse with front as well as peak oscillations (LlFPO) and impulse with noise (LIN) have been considered. Based on the above analysis, a conclusion is arrived.","PeriodicalId":405847,"journal":{"name":"TENCON 2003. Conference on Convergent Technologies for Asia-Pacific Region","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TENCON 2003. Conference on Convergent Technologies for Asia-Pacific Region","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2003.1273183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The parameters of lightning impulse (LI) can be determined as per IEC-60/IEEE-4 standard, if the shape of the impulse is smooth. However, difficulties arise if the oscillations or overshoot are superimposed on the waveform. If the frequency of such oscillation is greater than 0.5 MHz or the duration of overshoot is less than 1 /spl mu/sec, it is essential to determine the mean curve for evaluating LI Parameters. In this work, two approaches in evaluating the mean curve are extensively analyzed. The first approach is based on multiresolution signal decomposition. This technique uses the wavelet transform, where a dyadic-orthonormal function decomposes the signal into a smooth and detailed version of the original signal. After removing high frequency components from detailed signal, the mean curve of the impulse waveform can be reconstructed. The second approach is based on mathematical curve fitting where smooth or oscillating impulse is represented by a non-linear impulse waveform equation, representing a double exponential function with sine and cosine terms and Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm is used to minimize least mean square error. The merits and demerits of the above two methods are compared and analyzed. Case studies involving the standard lightning impulse (SLI), lighting impulse with front oscillations (LIFO), with peak oscillations (LIPO), impulse with long duration overshoot (LILDO), impulse with front as well as peak oscillations (LlFPO) and impulse with noise (LIN) have been considered. Based on the above analysis, a conclusion is arrived.
雷电冲击参数评价方法的比较研究
雷击脉冲(LI)参数可按IEC-60/IEEE-4标准确定,如果雷击形状光滑。然而,如果振荡或超调叠加在波形上,就会出现困难。如果这种振荡的频率大于0.5 MHz或超调持续时间小于1 /spl mu/sec,则必须确定用于评估LI参数的平均曲线。在这项工作中,广泛分析了评估平均曲线的两种方法。第一种方法是基于多分辨率信号分解。该技术使用小波变换,其中二向正交函数将信号分解为原始信号的平滑和详细版本。从详细信号中去除高频成分后,可以重建脉冲波形的平均曲线。第二种方法是基于数学曲线拟合,其中平滑或振荡脉冲用非线性脉冲波形方程表示,用正弦和余弦项表示双指数函数,并使用Levenberg-Marquardt算法最小化均方误差。对这两种方法的优缺点进行了比较分析。案例研究包括标准雷电脉冲(SLI)、带前振荡的雷电脉冲(LIFO)、带峰值振荡的雷电脉冲(LIPO)、带长时间超调的雷电脉冲(LILDO)、带前振荡和峰值振荡的雷电脉冲(LlFPO)和带噪声的雷电脉冲(LIN)。基于以上分析,得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信