Dynamics of Power and Cooperation in Rural Development: The Case of Chianina Beef Production in Italy

Yoko Kanemasu, R. Sonnino
{"title":"Dynamics of Power and Cooperation in Rural Development: The Case of Chianina Beef Production in Italy","authors":"Yoko Kanemasu, R. Sonnino","doi":"10.48416/IJSAF.V16I2.271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article contributes to the theorization of the much-debated ‘paradigm shift’ from conventional agri-industrialism towards sustainable rural development through the adoption of an actor-oriented approach that focuses on the practices, initiatives and experiences of rural actors themselves. Building on existing conceptualizations of rural actors as active agents, we analyse cooperative relations amongst quality meat producers in central Italy to shed light onto the dynamics of their collective interventions. Our case study demonstrates that seemingly ‘alternative’ rural development processes do not necessarily represent a smooth transition towards a new paradigm. Whilst producers have the capacity to collectively negotiate the pressures of the conventional agri-food system, their agency encompasses also conscious attempts to manoeuvre a highly ambiguous relationship with conventional markets to their advantage. Such ‘empowerment’ is also far from unproblematic. Collective actions provide producers with a degree of power, which, however, is subject to an asymmetrical distribution that seems to parallel that of agri-industrialism. In other words, producers’ collective action against the dominant forces of agro-industrial globalization is a contested process of allocation of power over productive relations and the market. Our analysis hence problematises the notion of ‘paradigm shift’ and calls for further research that critically examines the power differentials that reside in different dimensions of rural development practices.","PeriodicalId":302742,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48416/IJSAF.V16I2.271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This article contributes to the theorization of the much-debated ‘paradigm shift’ from conventional agri-industrialism towards sustainable rural development through the adoption of an actor-oriented approach that focuses on the practices, initiatives and experiences of rural actors themselves. Building on existing conceptualizations of rural actors as active agents, we analyse cooperative relations amongst quality meat producers in central Italy to shed light onto the dynamics of their collective interventions. Our case study demonstrates that seemingly ‘alternative’ rural development processes do not necessarily represent a smooth transition towards a new paradigm. Whilst producers have the capacity to collectively negotiate the pressures of the conventional agri-food system, their agency encompasses also conscious attempts to manoeuvre a highly ambiguous relationship with conventional markets to their advantage. Such ‘empowerment’ is also far from unproblematic. Collective actions provide producers with a degree of power, which, however, is subject to an asymmetrical distribution that seems to parallel that of agri-industrialism. In other words, producers’ collective action against the dominant forces of agro-industrial globalization is a contested process of allocation of power over productive relations and the market. Our analysis hence problematises the notion of ‘paradigm shift’ and calls for further research that critically examines the power differentials that reside in different dimensions of rural development practices.
农村发展中的动力与合作:以意大利的中国牛肉生产为例
本文通过采用侧重于农村行动者本身的实践、倡议和经验的以行动者为导向的方法,将备受争议的从传统农业-工业主义向可持续农村发展的“范式转变”理论化。在农村行动者作为积极行动者的现有概念的基础上,我们分析了意大利中部优质肉类生产商之间的合作关系,以阐明他们集体干预的动态。我们的案例研究表明,看似“另类”的农村发展进程并不一定代表着向新范式的平稳过渡。虽然生产者有能力集体协商传统农业食品系统的压力,但他们的代理也有意识地试图操纵与传统市场的高度模糊关系,以使其受益。这种“授权”也绝非毫无问题。集体行动为生产者提供了一定程度的权力,然而,这种权力受制于一种不对称的分配,似乎与农业-工业主义类似。换句话说,生产者反对农业-工业全球化主导力量的集体行动是一个在生产关系和市场上分配权力的有争议的过程。因此,我们的分析对“范式转移”的概念提出了问题,并呼吁进一步研究,批判性地审视存在于农村发展实践不同维度的权力差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信