Evaluation of Aluminium Oxide and Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles for EOR Applications

Alexander Sebastian Hogeweg, R. Hincapie, Hendrik Foedisch, L. Ganzer
{"title":"Evaluation of Aluminium Oxide and Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles for EOR Applications","authors":"Alexander Sebastian Hogeweg, R. Hincapie, Hendrik Foedisch, L. Ganzer","doi":"10.2118/190872-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Utilization of nanoparticles in EOR have gained high attention recently, with good but controversial results reported on improving oil recovery. Within this work two types of nanoparticles are selected and assessed, to determine its effect in oil mobilization. The experimental evaluation is performed using micromodels (EOR chips), in combination with a detailed nanofluids characterization. The workflow presented is a useful approach that can extended among different laboratories as preliminary evaluation.\n The workflow comprises a set of interrelated steps: 1) Selection and preparation of the Aluminium Oxide (Al2O3) and Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) nanofluids, influenced by recent literature comparisons, 2) Detailed rheological evaluation of nanofluids and oil, 3) Investigation of the Fluid-Fluid interaction by means of the interfacial tension (IFT) and nanoparticles effects in oil viscosity, 4) Two-phase flow experiments using EOR chips (breakthrough and mobilized oil vs PV injected), 5) Image processing analysis, leading to 6) Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the experimental data.\n As expected, we observed that diluting nanoparticles in fresh water increased the stability compared to brine. It was required the use of a stabilizer to optimize nanofluids characteristics. Unlike reported in the literature where Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) is used, we found that adding Poly(ethylene oxide)-(PEO) leads to a more stable nanofluids. There, seemed to be a tendency for the Al2O3 nanoparticles to reduce the viscosity of the aqueous-phase, when combined with PEO. Moreover, when Al2O3 was added to the oleic-phase increased its viscosity, with a strong dependency of soaking process. The image process analysis allowed to generate algorithms to calculate concentrations and saturations among the two-phase flow experiments. These algorithms proved to be highly beneficial enabling qualitative and also quantitative analysis of mobilized oil zones, as well as plugged areas. The experimental results did not show a significantly strong increase in mobilized oil due to Titanium Dioxide nanofluids, but slightly better results were observed with the Alumnium Oxide nanofluid in a low concentration.\n Much research in recent years has focused on the study of Silica nanoparticles. Since different other nanoparticles can be commercially found, this work presents additive information to the existing body of literature. Moreover, the workflow presented can be used by fellow researchers as preliminary tool for laboratory evaluations. These, to obtain potential useful insights from oil mobilization by the application of nanoparticles flooding.","PeriodicalId":178883,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, June 14, 2018","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, June 14, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/190872-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Utilization of nanoparticles in EOR have gained high attention recently, with good but controversial results reported on improving oil recovery. Within this work two types of nanoparticles are selected and assessed, to determine its effect in oil mobilization. The experimental evaluation is performed using micromodels (EOR chips), in combination with a detailed nanofluids characterization. The workflow presented is a useful approach that can extended among different laboratories as preliminary evaluation. The workflow comprises a set of interrelated steps: 1) Selection and preparation of the Aluminium Oxide (Al2O3) and Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) nanofluids, influenced by recent literature comparisons, 2) Detailed rheological evaluation of nanofluids and oil, 3) Investigation of the Fluid-Fluid interaction by means of the interfacial tension (IFT) and nanoparticles effects in oil viscosity, 4) Two-phase flow experiments using EOR chips (breakthrough and mobilized oil vs PV injected), 5) Image processing analysis, leading to 6) Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the experimental data. As expected, we observed that diluting nanoparticles in fresh water increased the stability compared to brine. It was required the use of a stabilizer to optimize nanofluids characteristics. Unlike reported in the literature where Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) is used, we found that adding Poly(ethylene oxide)-(PEO) leads to a more stable nanofluids. There, seemed to be a tendency for the Al2O3 nanoparticles to reduce the viscosity of the aqueous-phase, when combined with PEO. Moreover, when Al2O3 was added to the oleic-phase increased its viscosity, with a strong dependency of soaking process. The image process analysis allowed to generate algorithms to calculate concentrations and saturations among the two-phase flow experiments. These algorithms proved to be highly beneficial enabling qualitative and also quantitative analysis of mobilized oil zones, as well as plugged areas. The experimental results did not show a significantly strong increase in mobilized oil due to Titanium Dioxide nanofluids, but slightly better results were observed with the Alumnium Oxide nanofluid in a low concentration. Much research in recent years has focused on the study of Silica nanoparticles. Since different other nanoparticles can be commercially found, this work presents additive information to the existing body of literature. Moreover, the workflow presented can be used by fellow researchers as preliminary tool for laboratory evaluations. These, to obtain potential useful insights from oil mobilization by the application of nanoparticles flooding.
用于提高采收率的氧化铝和二氧化钛纳米颗粒的评价
近年来,纳米颗粒在提高采收率方面的应用受到了高度关注,在提高采收率方面取得了不错的结果,但也存在争议。在这项工作中,选择并评估了两种类型的纳米颗粒,以确定其对石油动员的影响。实验评估使用微模型(EOR芯片),结合详细的纳米流体表征。提出的工作流程是一种有用的方法,可以在不同的实验室之间扩展作为初步评估。工作流程包括一组相互关联的步骤:1)受国内外文献比较影响,氧化铝(Al2O3)和二氧化钛(TiO2)纳米流体的选择和制备;2)纳米流体与油的详细流变学评价;3)通过界面张力(IFT)和纳米颗粒对油粘度的影响研究流体-流体相互作用;4)采用EOR芯片的两相流实验(突破和动员油与PV注入油);5)图像处理分析。6)对实验数据进行定量和定性分析。正如预期的那样,我们观察到,与盐水相比,在淡水中稀释纳米颗粒可以提高稳定性。需要使用稳定剂来优化纳米流体的特性。与文献报道的使用聚乙烯吡咯烷酮(PVP)不同,我们发现添加聚环氧乙烷(PEO)会产生更稳定的纳米流体。当与PEO结合时,Al2O3纳米颗粒似乎有降低水相粘度的趋势。此外,当Al2O3加入油相时,其粘度增加,与浸泡过程有很强的依赖性。图像处理分析允许生成算法来计算两相流实验中的浓度和饱和度。这些算法被证明是非常有益的,可以对活动油区和堵塞区域进行定性和定量分析。实验结果表明,二氧化钛纳米流体没有显著地增加油的流动性,但低浓度的氧化铝纳米流体的效果略好。二氧化硅纳米颗粒是近年来国内外研究的热点。由于其他不同的纳米颗粒可以在商业上找到,这项工作为现有的文献提供了补充信息。此外,所提出的工作流程可以被其他研究人员用作实验室评估的初步工具。这些都是为了从纳米颗粒驱油的应用中获得潜在的有用见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信