A comparison of contact distribution representations for learning to predict object interactions

Simon Leischnig, Stefan Luettgen, Oliver Kroemer, Jan Peters
{"title":"A comparison of contact distribution representations for learning to predict object interactions","authors":"Simon Leischnig, Stefan Luettgen, Oliver Kroemer, Jan Peters","doi":"10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2015.7363435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different contacts between objects afford different interactions between them. For example, while contacts below an object can provide support, contacts on opposing sides can be used for pinching. Hence, a robot can learn to predict which interactions are currently afforded based on the set of contacts. However, representing sets of contacts is not trivial, as the number of contacts is not fixed nor are the contacts ordered. In this paper, we compare different methods for representing contacts, including bag-of-features, probability product kernels, and random forests. These approaches model the distribution over the contacts without relying on task-specific features. The methods were evaluated on both simulated grasping data, as well as real robot grasps. The random forest and the normalized expected likelihood kernel approaches achieved the highest accuracies for the simulated experiments. In the case of the real robot data, the more robust exponential χ2 and Bhattacharyya kernels achieved higher accuracies.","PeriodicalId":417686,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2015.7363435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Different contacts between objects afford different interactions between them. For example, while contacts below an object can provide support, contacts on opposing sides can be used for pinching. Hence, a robot can learn to predict which interactions are currently afforded based on the set of contacts. However, representing sets of contacts is not trivial, as the number of contacts is not fixed nor are the contacts ordered. In this paper, we compare different methods for representing contacts, including bag-of-features, probability product kernels, and random forests. These approaches model the distribution over the contacts without relying on task-specific features. The methods were evaluated on both simulated grasping data, as well as real robot grasps. The random forest and the normalized expected likelihood kernel approaches achieved the highest accuracies for the simulated experiments. In the case of the real robot data, the more robust exponential χ2 and Bhattacharyya kernels achieved higher accuracies.
用于学习预测物体相互作用的接触分布表示的比较
对象之间不同的接触方式会产生不同的相互作用。例如,物体下方的触点可以提供支撑,而相对两侧的触点可以用来挤压。因此,机器人可以根据接触集学习预测当前提供的交互。然而,表示一组接触并不是简单的,因为接触的数量不是固定的,接触的顺序也不是固定的。在本文中,我们比较了不同的方法来表示接触,包括特征袋,概率积核和随机森林。这些方法对联系人的分布进行建模,而不依赖于特定于任务的特性。在仿真抓取数据和机器人实际抓取数据上对方法进行了评价。在模拟实验中,随机森林和归一化期望似然核方法的准确率最高。在真实机器人数据的情况下,更稳健的指数χ2和Bhattacharyya核获得更高的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信