Does Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Matter in China? Evidence from Financing and Investment Choices in the High Tech Industry

James S. Ang, Chaopeng Wu, Yingmei Cheng
{"title":"Does Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Matter in China? Evidence from Financing and Investment Choices in the High Tech Industry","authors":"James S. Ang, Chaopeng Wu, Yingmei Cheng","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1571392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financing of and investing in R&D are prone to risks of appropriation by competitors and the problem of information asymmetry. Although legal protection of intellectual property (IP) rights at the national level is necessary in encouraging financing of and investing in R&D, we show that the effective enforcement at the local level is critical. We focus on the impact of provincial level IP rights enforcement on the financing of and investing in R&D, using a unique and rich database of high technology firms. These firms are located in twenty-eight provinces/districts throughout China. The enforcement of IP rights differs at the provincial level, although the firms are under the same set of national and international laws. To identify the causal effect of provincial level IP rights enforcement on firm behavior, we use instrumental variable regressions to deal with the endogeneity issue. Controlling for provincial institutional factors such as economic development, banking system development, legal system performance, and local government corruption, we find that the enforcement of IP rights positively affects firms’ ability to acquire new external debt (including formal and informal financing). Firms in provinces with better enforcement of IP rights invest more in R&D, generate more innovation patents, and produce more sales from new products. The results confirm that enforcement of IP rights matters even in China. The evidence also suggests that facilitating financing and investing in R&D are the channels in which better IP rights enforcement could affect the growth of the economy.","PeriodicalId":188920,"journal":{"name":"INTL: Managing in Emerging Markets (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTL: Managing in Emerging Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1571392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Financing of and investing in R&D are prone to risks of appropriation by competitors and the problem of information asymmetry. Although legal protection of intellectual property (IP) rights at the national level is necessary in encouraging financing of and investing in R&D, we show that the effective enforcement at the local level is critical. We focus on the impact of provincial level IP rights enforcement on the financing of and investing in R&D, using a unique and rich database of high technology firms. These firms are located in twenty-eight provinces/districts throughout China. The enforcement of IP rights differs at the provincial level, although the firms are under the same set of national and international laws. To identify the causal effect of provincial level IP rights enforcement on firm behavior, we use instrumental variable regressions to deal with the endogeneity issue. Controlling for provincial institutional factors such as economic development, banking system development, legal system performance, and local government corruption, we find that the enforcement of IP rights positively affects firms’ ability to acquire new external debt (including formal and informal financing). Firms in provinces with better enforcement of IP rights invest more in R&D, generate more innovation patents, and produce more sales from new products. The results confirm that enforcement of IP rights matters even in China. The evidence also suggests that facilitating financing and investing in R&D are the channels in which better IP rights enforcement could affect the growth of the economy.
知识产权执法在中国重要吗?来自高技术产业融资与投资选择的证据
研发融资和研发投入容易存在被竞争对手侵占的风险和信息不对称问题。虽然在国家层面对知识产权的法律保护对于鼓励研发融资和投资是必要的,但我们表明,地方层面的有效执法至关重要。我们使用独特而丰富的高科技公司数据库,专注于省级知识产权执法对研发融资和投资的影响。这些公司分布在中国28个省/区。知识产权的执行在省级层面有所不同,尽管这些公司都在同一套国家和国际法律之下。为了确定省级知识产权执法对企业行为的因果关系,我们使用工具变量回归来处理内生性问题。在控制省级制度因素(如经济发展、银行体系发展、法律体系绩效和地方政府腐败)后,我们发现知识产权的实施对企业获得新外债(包括正式和非正式融资)的能力有积极影响。在知识产权执行较好的省份,企业在研发方面的投入更多,产生更多的创新专利,并通过新产品产生更多的销售额。调查结果证实,即使在中国,知识产权的执行也很重要。证据还表明,促进对研发的融资和投资是更好的知识产权执法可能影响经济增长的渠道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信