Effect of Small Tympanic Membrane Perforations on Hearing

S. Jafarov, Serhat Inan, A. F. Büyüklü, E. Durukan
{"title":"Effect of Small Tympanic Membrane Perforations on Hearing","authors":"S. Jafarov, Serhat Inan, A. F. Büyüklü, E. Durukan","doi":"10.24179/KBBBBC.2019-65479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The effects of perforations on middle-ear sound transmission are not well defined because of middle ears with TM perforations generally have additional pathological changes. The aim of the study is to compare the hearing loses in tympanic membrane perforation of quadrants with exclusion of the possible middle and inner ear pathologies that may have resulted any hearing loss. Material and Methods: Patients who attended Otorhinolaringology-Head Neck Surgery Department, and underwent type 1 tympanoplasty between 2011 January and 2014 December were retrospectively analyzed. Size of perforation had been described in millimeter and location was grouped as anteroinferior (AI), anterosuperior (AS), posteroinferior (PI), posterosuperior (PS). Results: Sixty-five patients (65 ears) with isolated TM perforations were included in the study. Twenty-seven (41.5%) perforations were in PI, 8 (12.3%) perforations PS, 25 (38.4%) perforations AI, and 5 (7.7%) perforations AS-localized. There were not statistically significant differences between 4 groups at each frequency (0.5 kHz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz, and 4 kHz) for air-bone gap. Statistically significant decrease of bone conduction thresholds was observed in AI group when compared with other groups at higher frequencies (2 and 4 kHz, p<0.05) and between small and moderate perforation groups in all frequencies (500, 1000, 2000 ve 4000 Hz, p value: p=0.025, p=0.025, p=0.037, p=0.034 respectively). Conclusion: The results showed that the air-bone gap increases with increasing size of perforation. However, no statistically significant air-bone gap differences between tympanic membrane quadrants were determined.","PeriodicalId":157542,"journal":{"name":"Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24179/KBBBBC.2019-65479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The effects of perforations on middle-ear sound transmission are not well defined because of middle ears with TM perforations generally have additional pathological changes. The aim of the study is to compare the hearing loses in tympanic membrane perforation of quadrants with exclusion of the possible middle and inner ear pathologies that may have resulted any hearing loss. Material and Methods: Patients who attended Otorhinolaringology-Head Neck Surgery Department, and underwent type 1 tympanoplasty between 2011 January and 2014 December were retrospectively analyzed. Size of perforation had been described in millimeter and location was grouped as anteroinferior (AI), anterosuperior (AS), posteroinferior (PI), posterosuperior (PS). Results: Sixty-five patients (65 ears) with isolated TM perforations were included in the study. Twenty-seven (41.5%) perforations were in PI, 8 (12.3%) perforations PS, 25 (38.4%) perforations AI, and 5 (7.7%) perforations AS-localized. There were not statistically significant differences between 4 groups at each frequency (0.5 kHz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz, and 4 kHz) for air-bone gap. Statistically significant decrease of bone conduction thresholds was observed in AI group when compared with other groups at higher frequencies (2 and 4 kHz, p<0.05) and between small and moderate perforation groups in all frequencies (500, 1000, 2000 ve 4000 Hz, p value: p=0.025, p=0.025, p=0.037, p=0.034 respectively). Conclusion: The results showed that the air-bone gap increases with increasing size of perforation. However, no statistically significant air-bone gap differences between tympanic membrane quadrants were determined.
小鼓膜穿孔对听力的影响
目的:中耳穿孔对中耳声音传递的影响尚不明确,因为中耳穿孔通常伴有额外的病理改变。本研究的目的是在排除可能导致听力损失的中耳和内耳病变的情况下,比较象限鼓膜穿孔的听力损失。材料与方法:回顾性分析2011年1月至2014年12月在耳鼻喉科-头颈外科就诊并行1型鼓室成形术的患者。穿孔大小以毫米为单位描述,位置分为前下(AI)、前上(as)、后下(PI)、后上(PS)。结果:65例孤立性TM穿孔患者(65耳)纳入研究。27个孔(41.5%)位于PI位置,8个孔(12.3%)位于PS位置,25个孔(38.4%)位于AI位置,5个孔(7.7%)位于as位置。各频率(0.5 kHz、1 kHz、2 kHz、4 kHz) 4组间气骨间隙差异无统计学意义。AI组骨传导阈值在较高频率(2、4 kHz, p<0.05)和小、中穿孔组在各频率(500、1000、2000、4000 Hz, p值分别为p=0.025、p=0.025、p=0.037、p=0.034)与其他组相比均有统计学意义降低。结论:气骨间隙随穿孔尺寸的增大而增大。然而,鼓膜象限之间的气骨间隙没有统计学上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信