SwarmFuzz: Discovering GPS Spoofing Attacks in Drone Swarms

Yingao Yao, Pritam Dash, K. Pattabiraman
{"title":"SwarmFuzz: Discovering GPS Spoofing Attacks in Drone Swarms","authors":"Yingao Yao, Pritam Dash, K. Pattabiraman","doi":"10.1109/DSN58367.2023.00043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Swarm robotics, particularly drone swarms, are used in various safety-critical tasks. While a lot of attention has been given to improving swarm control algorithms for improved intelligence, the security implications of various design choices in swarm control algorithms have not been studied. We highlight how an attacker can exploit the vulnerabilities in swarm control algorithms to disrupt drone swarms. Specifically, we show that the attacker can target a swarm member (target drone) through GPS spoofing attacks, and indirectly cause other swarm members (victim drones) to veer from their course, resulting in a collision with an obstacle. We call these Swarm Propagation Vulnerabilities. In this paper, we introduce SwarmFuzz, a fuzzing framework to capture the attacker's ability, and efficiently find such vulnerabilities in swarm control algorithms. SwarmFuzz uses a combination of graph theory and gradient-guided optimization to find the potential attack parameters. Our evaluation on a popular swarm control algorithm shows that SwarmFuzz achieves an average success rate of 48.8% in finding vulnerabilities, and compared to random fuzzing, has a 10x higher success rate, and 3x lower runtime. We also find that swarms of a larger size are more vulnerable to this attack type, for a given spoofing distance.","PeriodicalId":427725,"journal":{"name":"2023 53rd Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 53rd Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN58367.2023.00043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Swarm robotics, particularly drone swarms, are used in various safety-critical tasks. While a lot of attention has been given to improving swarm control algorithms for improved intelligence, the security implications of various design choices in swarm control algorithms have not been studied. We highlight how an attacker can exploit the vulnerabilities in swarm control algorithms to disrupt drone swarms. Specifically, we show that the attacker can target a swarm member (target drone) through GPS spoofing attacks, and indirectly cause other swarm members (victim drones) to veer from their course, resulting in a collision with an obstacle. We call these Swarm Propagation Vulnerabilities. In this paper, we introduce SwarmFuzz, a fuzzing framework to capture the attacker's ability, and efficiently find such vulnerabilities in swarm control algorithms. SwarmFuzz uses a combination of graph theory and gradient-guided optimization to find the potential attack parameters. Our evaluation on a popular swarm control algorithm shows that SwarmFuzz achieves an average success rate of 48.8% in finding vulnerabilities, and compared to random fuzzing, has a 10x higher success rate, and 3x lower runtime. We also find that swarms of a larger size are more vulnerable to this attack type, for a given spoofing distance.
SwarmFuzz:发现无人机群中的GPS欺骗攻击
蜂群机器人,尤其是无人机蜂群,被用于各种安全关键任务。虽然人们对改进群体控制算法以提高智能已经给予了很多关注,但对群体控制算法中各种设计选择的安全影响尚未进行研究。我们强调了攻击者如何利用群控制算法中的漏洞来破坏无人机群。具体来说,我们表明攻击者可以通过GPS欺骗攻击瞄准蜂群成员(目标无人机),并间接导致其他蜂群成员(受害者无人机)从他们的航向转向,导致与障碍物碰撞。我们称之为群体传播漏洞。在本文中,我们引入了一个模糊测试框架swarm fuzz来捕捉攻击者的能力,并有效地发现群控制算法中的此类漏洞。SwarmFuzz结合了图论和梯度引导优化来寻找潜在的攻击参数。我们对一种流行的群体控制算法的评估表明,swarm fuzz在发现漏洞方面的平均成功率为48.8%,与随机模糊相比,成功率高10倍,运行时间低3倍。我们还发现,对于给定的欺骗距离,较大规模的群集更容易受到这种攻击类型的攻击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信