Comparison Between Clinical Findings and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Lumbar Prolapsed Intervertebral Disc

Deepak Banjade
{"title":"Comparison Between Clinical Findings and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Lumbar Prolapsed Intervertebral Disc","authors":"Deepak Banjade","doi":"10.59173/noaj.20230902c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc is commonly associated abnormality with lower backache. Disc herniation of same size can be asymptomatic in one patient and agonizing in another patient. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a gold standard diagnostic investigation for prolapsed intervertebral disc. Despite of high sensitivity sometimes MRI shows abnormal findings even in the asymptomatic individuals indicating a moderate relationship between MRI and symptoms in the patient. The study was conducted to correlate the abnormalities observed on MRI and clinical features of lumbar disc prolapse. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from 20 December 2021 to 15 September 2022. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: 078/78-009/HG). A convenience sampling method was used. The study consisted of patients with low back pain and radiation to lower extremity or patient with MRI scan of lumbar spine. Clinical and MRI findings were correlated to know the association and significance of MR findings in producing symptoms. Results: The study included 68 patients with back pain between 18 to 55 years (mean 41± 8.79 years). Neurological symptoms were present in 26 (38.23%) patients. Disc bulge in MRI was noticed in 48 (45.28%), protrusion in 46 (43.39%) and extrusion in 10 (11.32%) levels, most seen at L5-S1 level (66.11%). The clinical level of pain distribution correlated well with the MRI level (Kappa 0.69), but not all disc bulges produced symptoms. Conclusion: Clinical features and Magnetic resonance imaging findings of disc prolapse had significant correlation similar to other studies done in a similar setting, but all imaging abnormalities may not have a clinical significance. Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging; intervertebral disc; prolapse; radiculopathy; correlation of data.","PeriodicalId":233960,"journal":{"name":"Nepal Orthopaedic Association Journal","volume":"s3-45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepal Orthopaedic Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59173/noaj.20230902c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc is commonly associated abnormality with lower backache. Disc herniation of same size can be asymptomatic in one patient and agonizing in another patient. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a gold standard diagnostic investigation for prolapsed intervertebral disc. Despite of high sensitivity sometimes MRI shows abnormal findings even in the asymptomatic individuals indicating a moderate relationship between MRI and symptoms in the patient. The study was conducted to correlate the abnormalities observed on MRI and clinical features of lumbar disc prolapse. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from 20 December 2021 to 15 September 2022. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: 078/78-009/HG). A convenience sampling method was used. The study consisted of patients with low back pain and radiation to lower extremity or patient with MRI scan of lumbar spine. Clinical and MRI findings were correlated to know the association and significance of MR findings in producing symptoms. Results: The study included 68 patients with back pain between 18 to 55 years (mean 41± 8.79 years). Neurological symptoms were present in 26 (38.23%) patients. Disc bulge in MRI was noticed in 48 (45.28%), protrusion in 46 (43.39%) and extrusion in 10 (11.32%) levels, most seen at L5-S1 level (66.11%). The clinical level of pain distribution correlated well with the MRI level (Kappa 0.69), but not all disc bulges produced symptoms. Conclusion: Clinical features and Magnetic resonance imaging findings of disc prolapse had significant correlation similar to other studies done in a similar setting, but all imaging abnormalities may not have a clinical significance. Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging; intervertebral disc; prolapse; radiculopathy; correlation of data.
腰椎间盘突出症的临床表现与磁共振成像的比较
简介:腰椎间盘突出通常与腰痛相关。同样大小的椎间盘突出可以在一个病人无症状,在另一个病人痛苦。磁共振成像(MRI)是椎间盘脱垂诊断的金标准。尽管MRI具有很高的敏感性,但有时即使在无症状的个体中也会显示异常结果,这表明MRI与患者的症状之间存在中度关系。该研究旨在将MRI异常与腰椎间盘突出症的临床特征联系起来。方法:从2021年12月20日至2022年9月15日进行了一项描述性横断面研究。获得了机构审查委员会(参考编号:078/78-009/HG)的伦理批准。采用方便抽样方法。该研究包括腰痛和下肢放射治疗的患者或腰椎MRI扫描的患者。将临床表现与MRI表现进行对比,以了解MR表现与症状产生的相关性和意义。结果:研究纳入了68例背痛患者,年龄在18 ~ 55岁之间(平均41±8.79岁)。26例(38.23%)患者出现神经系统症状。MRI显示椎间盘突出48例(45.28%),突出46例(43.39%),突出10例(11.32%),以L5-S1节段多见(66.11%)。疼痛分布的临床水平与MRI水平相关性良好(Kappa 0.69),但并非所有椎间盘突出都有症状。结论:椎间盘脱垂的临床特征与磁共振成像结果与其他类似背景下的研究有显著相关性,但所有影像学异常可能不具有临床意义。关键词:磁共振成像;椎间盘;脱垂;神经根病;数据的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信