Digital Utopias, Latina/o Mediated Realities

A. Valdivia
{"title":"Digital Utopias, Latina/o Mediated Realities","authors":"A. Valdivia","doi":"10.5744/florida/9781683401476.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is relatively little research on Latinas/os and digital utopias. Taking up issues of the presence and inclusion of Latinas/os in discussions and policies about new digital communications technologies, this chapter begins with the canonical scholarship by Harold Innis, James Carey, and Vincent Mosco on the technological sublime. Given the changing demographics of the US population, with the 2000 US Census documenting the majority/minority status of Latinas/os, it behooves us to disaggregate the discursive terrain for ethnicity and socioeconomic status in relation to the promise of digital communications technology. The myth of the technological sublime—that each new technology will solve our social ills, including the racial ones—continues to be reiterated in the contemporary digital environment. While all new communications technologies have the potential to improve and increase democracy, their deployment seldom results in the inclusion and adoption by racialized populations. Whereas racial and ethnic dimensions were present in iterations of the myth, often through absence and othering, outcomes have not greatly benefitted Latinas/os, especially youth. While “new media” digital technology is useful for Latinas/os to communicate across space, especially when separated by economic and war-fueled migration, we have to ask if utopian promises benefit the population in a democratic manner—and at this time the answer continues to be “no.”","PeriodicalId":116543,"journal":{"name":"Digital Humanities in Latin America","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Humanities in Latin America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5744/florida/9781683401476.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is relatively little research on Latinas/os and digital utopias. Taking up issues of the presence and inclusion of Latinas/os in discussions and policies about new digital communications technologies, this chapter begins with the canonical scholarship by Harold Innis, James Carey, and Vincent Mosco on the technological sublime. Given the changing demographics of the US population, with the 2000 US Census documenting the majority/minority status of Latinas/os, it behooves us to disaggregate the discursive terrain for ethnicity and socioeconomic status in relation to the promise of digital communications technology. The myth of the technological sublime—that each new technology will solve our social ills, including the racial ones—continues to be reiterated in the contemporary digital environment. While all new communications technologies have the potential to improve and increase democracy, their deployment seldom results in the inclusion and adoption by racialized populations. Whereas racial and ethnic dimensions were present in iterations of the myth, often through absence and othering, outcomes have not greatly benefitted Latinas/os, especially youth. While “new media” digital technology is useful for Latinas/os to communicate across space, especially when separated by economic and war-fueled migration, we have to ask if utopian promises benefit the population in a democratic manner—and at this time the answer continues to be “no.”
数字乌托邦,拉丁/非中介现实
关于拉丁裔和数字乌托邦的研究相对较少。本章讨论了拉丁裔/非裔美国人在有关新数字通信技术的讨论和政策中的存在和包容问题,从哈罗德·英尼斯、詹姆斯·凯里和文森特·莫斯科关于技术崇高的权威学术开始。鉴于美国人口结构的变化,2000年美国人口普查记录了拉丁裔/拉丁裔的多数/少数地位,我们有必要分解与数字通信技术前景相关的种族和社会经济地位的话语地形。技术崇高的神话——每一项新技术都将解决我们的社会弊病,包括种族问题——在当代数字环境中继续被重申。虽然所有新的通信技术都有改善和增加民主的潜力,但它们的部署很少导致种族化人口的包容和采用。尽管种族和民族维度经常通过缺席或其他方式出现在神话的迭代中,但结果并没有给拉丁裔/美洲人带来很大的好处,尤其是年轻人。虽然“新媒体”数位科技对拉丁美洲人的跨空间沟通很有用,特别是在经济和战争引发的移民分隔的情况下,我们不得不问,乌托邦的承诺是否能以民主的方式造福于人口,而目前的答案仍然是“否”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书