L'etat, C'est Moi: Why provincial Intra-governmental disputes in South Africa remain ungoverned by the final constitution and the Intergovernmental Relations Framework Act - and how we can best resolve them

S. Woolman
{"title":"L'etat, C'est Moi: Why provincial Intra-governmental disputes in South Africa remain ungoverned by the final constitution and the Intergovernmental Relations Framework Act - and how we can best resolve them","authors":"S. Woolman","doi":"10.4314/LDD.V13I1.54805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For years, lawyers, jurists and academics bemoaned a great gaping hole in our law : the Final Constitution had promised to establish a legal regime to mediate and to resolve intergovernmental conflicts. (Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Act 108 of 1996)(\"Final Constitution\" or \"FC\"). During the first decade of post-apartheid South African life (1996 - 2005), Parliament failed to make good FC s 41(2)'s guarantee that intergovernmental disputes would be resolved by legislation that prevented different spheres of government and opposing organs of state from going to war (or court) over vital policy matters.","PeriodicalId":341103,"journal":{"name":"Law, Democracy and Development","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Democracy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/LDD.V13I1.54805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

For years, lawyers, jurists and academics bemoaned a great gaping hole in our law : the Final Constitution had promised to establish a legal regime to mediate and to resolve intergovernmental conflicts. (Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Act 108 of 1996)("Final Constitution" or "FC"). During the first decade of post-apartheid South African life (1996 - 2005), Parliament failed to make good FC s 41(2)'s guarantee that intergovernmental disputes would be resolved by legislation that prevented different spheres of government and opposing organs of state from going to war (or court) over vital policy matters.
L'etat, C'est Moi:为何南非各省的政府内部争议仍未受最终宪法和政府间关系框架法案管辖,以及我们如何才能最好地解决这些争议
多年来,律师、法学家和学者哀叹我国法律的一个巨大漏洞:《最终宪法》承诺建立一个法律制度来调解和解决政府间冲突。1996年南非共和国宪法(1996年第108号法令)(“最终宪法”或“FC”)。在南非种族隔离后的第一个十年(1996 - 2005),议会未能履行《宪法》第41(2)条的保证,即通过立法解决政府间争端,防止政府的不同领域和对立的国家机构就重要的政策问题诉诸战争(或法庭)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信