Indirect effects in evidential assessment: a case study on regression test technology adoption

Emelie Engström, R. Feldt, R. Torkar
{"title":"Indirect effects in evidential assessment: a case study on regression test technology adoption","authors":"Emelie Engström, R. Feldt, R. Torkar","doi":"10.1145/2372233.2372239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is a need for efficient regression testing in most software development organizations. Often the proposed solutions involve automation. However, despite this being a well researched area, research results are rarely applied in industrial practice. Aim: In this paper we aim to bridge the gap between research and practice by providing examples of how evidence-based regression testing approaches can be adopted in industry. We also discuss challenges for the research community. Method: An industrial case study was carried out to evaluate the possibility to improve regression testing at Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications. We analyse the procedure undertaken based on frameworks from the evidence based software engineering, EBSE, paradigm (with a focus on the evidence) and automation literature (with a focus on the practical effects). Results: Our results pinpoint the need for systematic approaches when introducing a new tool. Practitioners and researchers need congruent guidelines supporting the appraisal of both the evidence base and the pragmatic effects, both direct but also indirect, of the changes. This is illustrated by the introduction of the automation perspective.","PeriodicalId":108514,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Evidential assessment of software technologies - EAST '12","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Evidential assessment of software technologies - EAST '12","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2372233.2372239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: There is a need for efficient regression testing in most software development organizations. Often the proposed solutions involve automation. However, despite this being a well researched area, research results are rarely applied in industrial practice. Aim: In this paper we aim to bridge the gap between research and practice by providing examples of how evidence-based regression testing approaches can be adopted in industry. We also discuss challenges for the research community. Method: An industrial case study was carried out to evaluate the possibility to improve regression testing at Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications. We analyse the procedure undertaken based on frameworks from the evidence based software engineering, EBSE, paradigm (with a focus on the evidence) and automation literature (with a focus on the practical effects). Results: Our results pinpoint the need for systematic approaches when introducing a new tool. Practitioners and researchers need congruent guidelines supporting the appraisal of both the evidence base and the pragmatic effects, both direct but also indirect, of the changes. This is illustrated by the introduction of the automation perspective.
证据评估的间接效应:回归测试技术采用的个案研究
背景:在大多数软件开发组织中都需要有效的回归测试。通常建议的解决方案涉及自动化。然而,尽管这是一个很好的研究领域,但研究成果很少应用于工业实践。目的:在本文中,我们旨在通过提供基于证据的回归测试方法如何在工业中采用的例子来弥合研究与实践之间的差距。我们还讨论了研究界面临的挑战。方法:通过一个行业案例研究来评估在索尼爱立信移动通信公司改进回归测试的可能性。我们根据基于证据的软件工程、EBSE、范式(侧重于证据)和自动化文献(侧重于实际效果)的框架来分析所采取的程序。结果:我们的结果明确了当引入一个新工具时需要系统的方法。从业人员和研究人员需要一致的指导方针来支持对这些变化的直接和间接的证据基础和实用效果的评估。自动化透视图的介绍说明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书