Comparison of a Datum Temperature Calibration Method With Traditional Approach for Norton Power Law

M. Haque
{"title":"Comparison of a Datum Temperature Calibration Method With Traditional Approach for Norton Power Law","authors":"M. Haque","doi":"10.1115/pvp2022-84415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Methods for minimum-creep-strain-rate prediction have evolved. Many models have been proposed, and different calibration techniques are used. Often the limitation of these models for accurate prediction arises due to a lack of long-range data incorporating both the low-stress and high-stress regions. This problem is more prominent for novel materials with very little data and may require long-term creep tests, delaying the material’s qualification. Model calibration against short-range data may lead to an inflection during extrapolation. In this study, a datum temperature (DT) calibration method derived from Parametric Numerical Isothermal Datum (P-NID) is compared with the traditional calibration approach for minimum-creep-strain-rate prediction using Norton power law. Minimum-creep-strain-rate data for Inconel 617 at five temperature levels (800 to 1000°C) and stress ranging from 11 to 122 MPa are used. Two different forms of the Norton power law are calibrated using the traditional approach and the most suitable form for Inconel 617 is selected. Next, the model is calibrated using the datum temperature calibration approach. In the datum temperature method, the data from different temperatures are transferred to a datum temperature creating a wide range of parametric data followed by model calibration against the transferred data at datum temperature. Finally, the model is transferred back to the original temperatures. The traditional approach and datum temperature method results are compared in terms of accuracy, calibration techniques, extrapolation, and limitations for Inconel 617. The datum temperature method is found to be accurate, like the traditional approach, however, requires comparatively less effort during calibration since the model is calibrated against a single temperature instead of multiple temperatures. Thus, the material constants are independent of temperature and stress resulting in stable, inflection-free, and reliable extrapolation over the traditional approach. A step-by-step procedure is provided to derive the datum temperature transformation equations and the calibration method. Finally, a general guideline is provided to apply the datum temperature method to any existing models.","PeriodicalId":434925,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4A: Materials and Fabrication","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4A: Materials and Fabrication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-84415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methods for minimum-creep-strain-rate prediction have evolved. Many models have been proposed, and different calibration techniques are used. Often the limitation of these models for accurate prediction arises due to a lack of long-range data incorporating both the low-stress and high-stress regions. This problem is more prominent for novel materials with very little data and may require long-term creep tests, delaying the material’s qualification. Model calibration against short-range data may lead to an inflection during extrapolation. In this study, a datum temperature (DT) calibration method derived from Parametric Numerical Isothermal Datum (P-NID) is compared with the traditional calibration approach for minimum-creep-strain-rate prediction using Norton power law. Minimum-creep-strain-rate data for Inconel 617 at five temperature levels (800 to 1000°C) and stress ranging from 11 to 122 MPa are used. Two different forms of the Norton power law are calibrated using the traditional approach and the most suitable form for Inconel 617 is selected. Next, the model is calibrated using the datum temperature calibration approach. In the datum temperature method, the data from different temperatures are transferred to a datum temperature creating a wide range of parametric data followed by model calibration against the transferred data at datum temperature. Finally, the model is transferred back to the original temperatures. The traditional approach and datum temperature method results are compared in terms of accuracy, calibration techniques, extrapolation, and limitations for Inconel 617. The datum temperature method is found to be accurate, like the traditional approach, however, requires comparatively less effort during calibration since the model is calibrated against a single temperature instead of multiple temperatures. Thus, the material constants are independent of temperature and stress resulting in stable, inflection-free, and reliable extrapolation over the traditional approach. A step-by-step procedure is provided to derive the datum temperature transformation equations and the calibration method. Finally, a general guideline is provided to apply the datum temperature method to any existing models.
诺顿幂律基准温度标定方法与传统方法的比较
最小蠕变应变率预测方法已经发展。提出了许多模型,并使用了不同的校准技术。由于缺乏包括低应力区和高应力区的长期数据,这些模型在准确预测方面往往存在局限性。对于数据很少的新材料,这一问题更为突出,可能需要长期的蠕变试验,从而推迟了材料的鉴定。根据短期数据进行模型校准可能会导致外推过程中的拐点。本文将基于参数等温数值基准面(P-NID)的基准温度(DT)标定方法与基于诺顿幂律的最小蠕变应变率预测的传统标定方法进行了比较。最小蠕变应变率数据为Inconel 617在五个温度水平(800至1000°C)和应力范围从11至122兆帕。使用传统方法校准了两种不同形式的诺顿幂律,并选择了最适合Inconel 617的形式。接下来,使用基准温度校准方法对模型进行校准。在基准温度法中,来自不同温度的数据被转移到一个基准温度,产生一个大范围的参数数据,然后根据在基准温度下转移的数据进行模型校准。最后,将模型转换回原始温度。比较了传统方法和基准温度法的精度、校准技术、外推和Inconel 617的局限性。与传统方法一样,基准温度方法是准确的,但由于模型是根据单一温度而不是多个温度进行校准,因此校准时所需的工作量相对较少。因此,材料常数与温度和应力无关,导致比传统方法稳定,无弯曲和可靠的外推。给出了逐步推导基准温度变换方程和标定方法的步骤。最后,给出了将基准温度法应用于任何现有模型的一般准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信