Feasibility of Physical and Occupational Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 Infection

M. Stutz, A. Leonhard, S. Pearson, C. Ward, P. Osorio, P. Herbst, K. Wolfe, A. Pohlman, J.B. Hall, B. Patel, J. Kress
{"title":"Feasibility of Physical and Occupational Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 Infection","authors":"M. Stutz, A. Leonhard, S. Pearson, C. Ward, P. Osorio, P. Herbst, K. Wolfe, A. Pohlman, J.B. Hall, B. Patel, J. Kress","doi":"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale:Early mobilization and physical rehabilitation improve functional outcomes and are essential to high quality critical care. Despite its importance, it is common for rehabilitation to be deferred in the critically ill due to a variety of barriers, including infection with SARS-CoV-2. We present a single academic center's experience providing physical and occupational therapy to critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Methods:All patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated illness admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from March 1st to July 31st, 2020 were identified in this retrospective chart review. Patients who received at least one therapy treatment session were included in the study. Results:Three-hundred and seventy-nine physical and occupational therapy sessions were conducted with 116 patients. The majority (85%) of patients were admitted to the ICU for hypoxemic respiratory failure. The median number of treatment sessions during ICU admission per patient was 2, (IQR: 1-4). The median time from ICU admission to first PT session was 4 days (IQR, 3-5). The median percentage of ICU days with physical and occupational therapy treatment was 33% (IQR, 21-50). The median session length was 25 minutes (IQR, 25-30min). Sitting was achieved in 353 sessions, (93%) standing was achieved in 261 sessions (69%), walking was achieved in 185 sessions (48%), and sitting in the bedside chair 118 times (31%).Patients with respiratory failure completed therapy sessions while receiving mechanical ventilation (21% of sessions), high flow nasal cannula (45% of sessions), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation by helmet and facemask (7% of sessions), and ECMO (12% of sessions). Patients requiring vasoactive medications (4%) and continuous renal replacement therapy (6%) were also treated by physical and occupational therapy. Delirium, determined by confusion assessment method (CAM-ICU), was frequently encountered by the physical and occupational therapy teams and was not an absolute barrier (32%) (Table 1). Discharge destinations included: home (n=57, 61%), acute rehabilitation units (n=16, 17%), long term acute care hospitals (n=9, 10%), sub-acute care centers (n=8, 8%), and skilled nursing facilities (n=4, 4%). No members of the therapy team were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 during the study period. Conclusions:This report demonstrates the feasibility of conducting physical and occupational therapy in COVID-19 specific ICUs. Providing therapy services appeared to be safe for patients and members of the therapy team, as adverse events were rare and no therapist was diagnosed with COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":111156,"journal":{"name":"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale:Early mobilization and physical rehabilitation improve functional outcomes and are essential to high quality critical care. Despite its importance, it is common for rehabilitation to be deferred in the critically ill due to a variety of barriers, including infection with SARS-CoV-2. We present a single academic center's experience providing physical and occupational therapy to critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Methods:All patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated illness admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from March 1st to July 31st, 2020 were identified in this retrospective chart review. Patients who received at least one therapy treatment session were included in the study. Results:Three-hundred and seventy-nine physical and occupational therapy sessions were conducted with 116 patients. The majority (85%) of patients were admitted to the ICU for hypoxemic respiratory failure. The median number of treatment sessions during ICU admission per patient was 2, (IQR: 1-4). The median time from ICU admission to first PT session was 4 days (IQR, 3-5). The median percentage of ICU days with physical and occupational therapy treatment was 33% (IQR, 21-50). The median session length was 25 minutes (IQR, 25-30min). Sitting was achieved in 353 sessions, (93%) standing was achieved in 261 sessions (69%), walking was achieved in 185 sessions (48%), and sitting in the bedside chair 118 times (31%).Patients with respiratory failure completed therapy sessions while receiving mechanical ventilation (21% of sessions), high flow nasal cannula (45% of sessions), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation by helmet and facemask (7% of sessions), and ECMO (12% of sessions). Patients requiring vasoactive medications (4%) and continuous renal replacement therapy (6%) were also treated by physical and occupational therapy. Delirium, determined by confusion assessment method (CAM-ICU), was frequently encountered by the physical and occupational therapy teams and was not an absolute barrier (32%) (Table 1). Discharge destinations included: home (n=57, 61%), acute rehabilitation units (n=16, 17%), long term acute care hospitals (n=9, 10%), sub-acute care centers (n=8, 8%), and skilled nursing facilities (n=4, 4%). No members of the therapy team were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 during the study period. Conclusions:This report demonstrates the feasibility of conducting physical and occupational therapy in COVID-19 specific ICUs. Providing therapy services appeared to be safe for patients and members of the therapy team, as adverse events were rare and no therapist was diagnosed with COVID-19.
COVID-19感染危重患者物理和职业治疗的可行性
理由:早期活动和身体康复可以改善功能结果,对高质量的重症监护至关重要。尽管康复很重要,但由于各种障碍(包括感染SARS-CoV-2),危重患者的康复通常会被推迟。我们介绍了一个学术中心为SARS-CoV-2感染的危重患者提供物理和职业治疗的经验。方法:回顾性分析2020年3月1日至7月31日在我院重症监护病房(ICU)收治的所有2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关疾病患者。接受过至少一次治疗的患者被纳入研究。结果:对116例患者进行了379次物理和职业治疗。大多数(85%)患者因低氧性呼吸衰竭入住ICU。每位患者在ICU住院期间的治疗次数中位数为2,(IQR: 1-4)。从ICU入院到第一次PT治疗的中位时间为4天(IQR, 3-5)。接受物理和职业治疗的ICU天数中位数百分比为33% (IQR, 21-50)。中位疗程长度为25分钟(IQR, 25-30分钟)。坐着的有353次,站立的有261次(69%),行走的有185次(48%),坐在床边的椅子上的有118次(31%)。呼吸衰竭患者在接受机械通气(21%)、高流量鼻插管(45%)、头盔和面罩无创正压通气(7%)和ECMO(12%)的同时完成了治疗。需要血管活性药物(4%)和持续肾脏替代治疗(6%)的患者也接受物理和职业治疗。神志不清评估法(cami - icu)确定谵妄是物理和职业治疗团队经常遇到的问题,并不是绝对障碍(32%)(表1)。出院地点包括:家庭(n=57, 61%)、急性康复单位(n=16, 17%)、长期急性护理医院(n=9, 10%)、亚急性护理中心(n=8, 8%)和熟练护理机构(n= 4,4%)。在研究期间,治疗小组的成员没有被诊断出患有SARS-CoV-2。结论:本报告论证了在COVID-19重症监护病房开展物理和职业治疗的可行性。提供治疗服务似乎对患者和治疗团队成员是安全的,因为不良事件很少,而且没有治疗师被诊断出患有COVID-19。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信