Negotiating “Historical Truth”: Art, Authority, and Iurii Shaporin’s The Decembrists

Leah Goldman
{"title":"Negotiating “Historical Truth”: Art, Authority, and Iurii Shaporin’s The Decembrists","authors":"Leah Goldman","doi":"10.1525/JM.2016.33.3.277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1925, when Soviet composer Iurii Shaporin began writing his first opera, Polina Gebl’ , about the Decembrist Ivan Annenkov and the French emigree shopgirl who followed him into exile, he had no idea how tumultuous its journey would be. It took twenty-eight years and countless revisions for the opera to gain official approval. When it finally premiered at the Bolshoi Theater in 1953, with the title The Decembrists , the love story had been backgrounded and the historical plot line vastly expanded; scenes, characters, and arias had been added, dropped, or altered; and Polina herself had been written out entirely. The negotiated process by which Polina became The Decembrists reveals much about the evolving relationship between music and power in the Soviet Union, especially in the high-stakes realm of Socialist Realist opera, in which a suitable exemplar had yet to be produced. Amidst the pressures of the late-Stalinist state’s assault on the creative intelligentsia, and in the wake of major opera scandals in the 1930s and 1940s, the Bolshoi Theater saw in Shaporin’s work an ideal candidate to fill this void: a historical opera with an unimpeachable subject, the Decembrist Revolution, understood as the foundation point of the revolutionary legacy to which the Bolsheviks laid claim. This article analyzes the intense negotiations among Shaporin, the Bolshoi and its consultants, and official censors to ensure The Decembrists ’ historical accuracy, which they believed would guarantee its acceptance. Yet, as the article demonstrates, while Soviet musical authorities upheld “historical truth” as their standard, in the end the Socialist Realist ideal of “artistic truth” was far more important for The Decembrists’ success.","PeriodicalId":413730,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Musicology","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Musicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/JM.2016.33.3.277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1925, when Soviet composer Iurii Shaporin began writing his first opera, Polina Gebl’ , about the Decembrist Ivan Annenkov and the French emigree shopgirl who followed him into exile, he had no idea how tumultuous its journey would be. It took twenty-eight years and countless revisions for the opera to gain official approval. When it finally premiered at the Bolshoi Theater in 1953, with the title The Decembrists , the love story had been backgrounded and the historical plot line vastly expanded; scenes, characters, and arias had been added, dropped, or altered; and Polina herself had been written out entirely. The negotiated process by which Polina became The Decembrists reveals much about the evolving relationship between music and power in the Soviet Union, especially in the high-stakes realm of Socialist Realist opera, in which a suitable exemplar had yet to be produced. Amidst the pressures of the late-Stalinist state’s assault on the creative intelligentsia, and in the wake of major opera scandals in the 1930s and 1940s, the Bolshoi Theater saw in Shaporin’s work an ideal candidate to fill this void: a historical opera with an unimpeachable subject, the Decembrist Revolution, understood as the foundation point of the revolutionary legacy to which the Bolsheviks laid claim. This article analyzes the intense negotiations among Shaporin, the Bolshoi and its consultants, and official censors to ensure The Decembrists ’ historical accuracy, which they believed would guarantee its acceptance. Yet, as the article demonstrates, while Soviet musical authorities upheld “historical truth” as their standard, in the end the Socialist Realist ideal of “artistic truth” was far more important for The Decembrists’ success.
协商“历史真相”:艺术、权威和尤里·沙波林的《十二月党人》
1925年,当苏联作曲家尤里·沙波林(urii Shaporin)开始创作他的第一部歌剧《波琳娜·格布尔》(Polina Gebl)时,他不知道这段旅程会有多么动荡。这部歌剧讲述了十二月党人伊万·安年科夫(Ivan Annenkov)和跟随他流亡的法国女店员的故事。这部歌剧花了28年时间和无数次修改才获得官方批准。1953年,当它最终以《十二月党人》(the Decembrists)的名字在莫斯科大剧院(Bolshoi Theater)首演时,这个爱情故事已经有了背景,历史情节也得到了极大的扩展;场景、人物和咏叹调被添加、删除或修改;波琳娜本人也完全被删掉了。波琳娜成为《十二月党人》的谈判过程,在很大程度上揭示了苏联音乐与权力之间不断演变的关系,特别是在高风险的社会主义现实主义歌剧领域,一个合适的典范尚未产生。在斯大林后期国家对创造性知识分子的攻击所带来的压力中,在20世纪30年代和40年代的重大歌剧丑闻之后,莫斯科大剧院认为沙波林的作品是填补这一空白的理想人选:一部以十二月党人革命为主题的历史歌剧,被理解为布尔什维克所主张的革命遗产的基础。本文分析了沙波林、莫斯科大剧院及其顾问与官方审查机构之间的激烈谈判,以确保《十二月党人》的历史准确性,他们认为这将保证其被接受。然而,正如文章所表明的那样,尽管苏联音乐当局坚持“历史真实”作为他们的标准,但最终,社会主义现实主义的“艺术真实”理想对十二月党人的成功更为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信