Ignorance Isn't Bliss: An Empirical Analysis of Attention Patterns in Online Communities

Claudia Wagner, Matthew Rowe, M. Strohmaier, Harith Alani
{"title":"Ignorance Isn't Bliss: An Empirical Analysis of Attention Patterns in Online Communities","authors":"Claudia Wagner, Matthew Rowe, M. Strohmaier, Harith Alani","doi":"10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online community managers work towards building and managing communities around a given brand or topic. Arisk imposed on such managers is that their community may die out and its utility diminish to users. Understanding what drives attention to content and the dynamics of discussions in a given community informs the community manager and/or host with the factors that are associated with attention, allowing them to detect a reduction in such factors. In this paper we gain insights into the idiosyncrasies that individual community forums exhibit in their attention patterns and how the factors that impact activity differ. We glean such insights through a two-stage approach that functions by (i) differentiating between seed posts - i.e. posts that solicit a reply - and non-seed posts - i.e. posts that did not get any replies, and (ii) predicting the level of attention that seed posts will generate. We explore the effectiveness of a range of features for predicting discussions and analyse their potential impact on discussion initiation and progress. Our findings show that the discussion behaviour of different communities exhibit interesting differences in terms of how attention is generated. Our results show amongst others that the purpose of a community as well as the specificity of the topic of a community impact which factors drive the reply behaviour of a community. For example, communities around very specific topics require posts to fit to the topical focus of the community in order to attract attention while communities around more general topics do not have this requirement. We also found that the factors which impact the start of discussions in communities often differ from the factors which impact the length of discussions.","PeriodicalId":129526,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Online community managers work towards building and managing communities around a given brand or topic. Arisk imposed on such managers is that their community may die out and its utility diminish to users. Understanding what drives attention to content and the dynamics of discussions in a given community informs the community manager and/or host with the factors that are associated with attention, allowing them to detect a reduction in such factors. In this paper we gain insights into the idiosyncrasies that individual community forums exhibit in their attention patterns and how the factors that impact activity differ. We glean such insights through a two-stage approach that functions by (i) differentiating between seed posts - i.e. posts that solicit a reply - and non-seed posts - i.e. posts that did not get any replies, and (ii) predicting the level of attention that seed posts will generate. We explore the effectiveness of a range of features for predicting discussions and analyse their potential impact on discussion initiation and progress. Our findings show that the discussion behaviour of different communities exhibit interesting differences in terms of how attention is generated. Our results show amongst others that the purpose of a community as well as the specificity of the topic of a community impact which factors drive the reply behaviour of a community. For example, communities around very specific topics require posts to fit to the topical focus of the community in order to attract attention while communities around more general topics do not have this requirement. We also found that the factors which impact the start of discussions in communities often differ from the factors which impact the length of discussions.
无知不是福:在线社区注意力模式的实证分析
在线社区管理员致力于围绕特定品牌或主题建立和管理社区。这些管理者面临的风险是,他们的社区可能会消亡,对用户的效用也会减少。了解是什么推动了对内容的关注,以及给定社区中讨论的动态,可以告知社区经理和/或主持人与关注相关的因素,从而使他们能够检测到这些因素的减少。在本文中,我们深入了解了个别社区论坛在其注意力模式中所表现出的特质,以及影响活动的因素是如何不同的。我们通过两个阶段的方法收集这些见解,该方法的功能是(i)区分种子帖子(即征求回复的帖子)和非种子帖子(即没有得到任何回复的帖子),以及(ii)预测种子帖子将产生的关注程度。我们探讨了预测讨论的一系列特征的有效性,并分析了它们对讨论启动和进展的潜在影响。我们的研究结果表明,不同社区的讨论行为在如何产生注意力方面表现出有趣的差异。我们的研究结果表明,社区的目的以及社区主题的特殊性影响着社区的回复行为。例如,围绕非常具体的主题的社区要求帖子适合社区的主题焦点,以吸引关注,而围绕更一般主题的社区则没有这个要求。我们还发现,影响社区讨论开始的因素往往与影响讨论时间长短的因素不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信