Thomson on Goodness

J. Lenman
{"title":"Thomson on Goodness","authors":"J. Lenman","doi":"10.24310/METYPER.2018.V0I19.4897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Judith Jarvis Thomson has written extensively on what is usually (though she does not seem much to care for the word) known as ‘metaethics’. Notably in the Thomson half of Harman and Thomson’s 1996 Moral Knowledge and Moral Objectivity, the 1997 Journal of Philosophy paper “The Right and the Good”, and her Tanner Lectures in Goodness and Advice published in 2003.  Thomson thinks there is no such thing as being good simpliciter. There is only what she sometimes talks of as being good in a way or being good in some respect. A thing can be good at stuff, good at football or baking or whatever. This critical note analyses what is at stake in Thomson's approach.  Keywords: Metaethics, Judith Thomson, Consequentialism, Moral good ","PeriodicalId":373903,"journal":{"name":"Metafísica y persona","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metafísica y persona","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24310/METYPER.2018.V0I19.4897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Judith Jarvis Thomson has written extensively on what is usually (though she does not seem much to care for the word) known as ‘metaethics’. Notably in the Thomson half of Harman and Thomson’s 1996 Moral Knowledge and Moral Objectivity, the 1997 Journal of Philosophy paper “The Right and the Good”, and her Tanner Lectures in Goodness and Advice published in 2003.  Thomson thinks there is no such thing as being good simpliciter. There is only what she sometimes talks of as being good in a way or being good in some respect. A thing can be good at stuff, good at football or baking or whatever. This critical note analyses what is at stake in Thomson's approach.  Keywords: Metaethics, Judith Thomson, Consequentialism, Moral good 
Thomson on Goodness
朱迪思·贾维斯·汤姆森(Judith Jarvis Thomson)写了大量关于通常被称为“元伦理学”(尽管她似乎不太喜欢这个词)的文章。尤其是在哈曼和汤姆森1996年出版的《道德知识和道德客观性》的汤姆森一半,1997年发表在《哲学杂志》上的论文《权利与善》,以及她2003年发表的《善良与建议》的坦纳讲座。汤姆森认为,没有所谓的“优秀的简化者”。只有她有时会说在某种程度上或在某些方面是好的。一个东西可以擅长某件事,擅长足球或烘焙或其他任何事情。这篇评论分析了汤姆森方法的利害所在。关键词:元伦理学,朱迪斯·汤姆森,结果主义,道德善
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信