Assessment for the COVID-19 outbreak situation and importation risk of the 14 land-bordering countries of China

Xinping Yang, Mingfan Pang, Z. Liang, Xiao-Ping Dong, Ke Lyu, G. Shi, Xiaoming Shi, Jing-jing Xi, Luzhao Feng, Xiaopeng Qi, Xinhua Li
{"title":"Assessment for the COVID-19 outbreak situation and importation risk of the 14 land-bordering countries of China","authors":"Xinping Yang, Mingfan Pang, Z. Liang, Xiao-Ping Dong, Ke Lyu, G. Shi, Xiaoming Shi, Jing-jing Xi, Luzhao Feng, Xiaopeng Qi, Xinhua Li","doi":"10.3784/J.ISSN.1003-9961.2020.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo analyze the COVID-19 epidemics in 14 land-bordering countries of China, evaluate the risk of imported cases to China, and provide evidence for the further prevention of imported COVID-19. MethodsThe public information about COVID-19 epidemics in these countries were collected from their government websites, mainstream media, relevant professional portals and officially published literature, and the SEIR mathematic modeling of infectious diseases and the COVID-19 Government Response Stringency Index published by the University of Oxford were used for an analysis on the incidences of COVID-19 and tests of 2019-nCoV, the numbers of overseas Chinese, the population and health resources, and control measures in these countries. ResultsGenerally, the testing coverage rates of 2019-nCoV in these land-bordering countries are low, and there might be a large number of undiagnosed and unreported cases. At present, Russia has the highest case number, with a relatively low COVID-19 Government Response Stringency Index, as well as a high proportion of elderly population, so there might be a great potential demand for intensive care in the future. India and Pakistan, which have a large population and fewer healthcare workers, are second only to Russia in the number of cases, and might face a shortage of medical resources in the future. ConclusionThe risk of imported COVID-19 to China from the 14 bordering countries is considered to be high. Therefore, continuous attention is needed for all the land port cities. It is suggested that the capacities of port cities to deal with the imported COVID-19 cases should be evaluated in time, and the preparedness plan for the port city response to imported COVID-19 cases should be formulated as soon as possible. Meanwhile, the mechanism of entry health screening and patient transferring should be established and strengthened.","PeriodicalId":400762,"journal":{"name":"Disease Surveillance","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disease Surveillance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3784/J.ISSN.1003-9961.2020.04.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ObjectiveTo analyze the COVID-19 epidemics in 14 land-bordering countries of China, evaluate the risk of imported cases to China, and provide evidence for the further prevention of imported COVID-19. MethodsThe public information about COVID-19 epidemics in these countries were collected from their government websites, mainstream media, relevant professional portals and officially published literature, and the SEIR mathematic modeling of infectious diseases and the COVID-19 Government Response Stringency Index published by the University of Oxford were used for an analysis on the incidences of COVID-19 and tests of 2019-nCoV, the numbers of overseas Chinese, the population and health resources, and control measures in these countries. ResultsGenerally, the testing coverage rates of 2019-nCoV in these land-bordering countries are low, and there might be a large number of undiagnosed and unreported cases. At present, Russia has the highest case number, with a relatively low COVID-19 Government Response Stringency Index, as well as a high proportion of elderly population, so there might be a great potential demand for intensive care in the future. India and Pakistan, which have a large population and fewer healthcare workers, are second only to Russia in the number of cases, and might face a shortage of medical resources in the future. ConclusionThe risk of imported COVID-19 to China from the 14 bordering countries is considered to be high. Therefore, continuous attention is needed for all the land port cities. It is suggested that the capacities of port cities to deal with the imported COVID-19 cases should be evaluated in time, and the preparedness plan for the port city response to imported COVID-19 cases should be formulated as soon as possible. Meanwhile, the mechanism of entry health screening and patient transferring should be established and strengthened.
中国14个陆路沿岸国新冠肺炎疫情形势及输入风险评估
目的分析中国14个陆路沿边国家新冠肺炎疫情情况,评估输入性病例的风险,为进一步防控输入性新冠肺炎提供依据。方法收集这些国家政府网站、主流媒体、相关专业门户网站和官方发表文献等公开的新冠肺炎疫情信息,采用英国牛津大学发布的SEIR传染病数学模型和新冠肺炎政府应对严谨性指数,对这些国家的新冠肺炎发病率和检测结果、海外华人人数、这些国家的人口和卫生资源及控制措施。结果总体而言,这些陆地边境国家2019-nCoV检测覆盖率较低,可能存在大量未确诊和未报告病例。目前,俄罗斯的病例数最高,COVID-19政府应对严格指数相对较低,老年人口比例较高,未来重症监护的潜在需求可能很大。印度和巴基斯坦人口众多,医护人员较少,病例数量仅次于俄罗斯,未来可能面临医疗资源短缺的问题。结论中国从14个边境国家输入新型冠状病毒肺炎的风险较高。因此,所有陆港城市都需要持续关注。建议及时评估口岸城市应对输入性新冠肺炎能力,尽快制定口岸城市应对输入性新冠肺炎预案。同时,应建立和加强入境健康筛查和转诊机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信