The Concept of Experience as Grounding for The Waste Land

C. Altieri
{"title":"The Concept of Experience as Grounding for The Waste Land","authors":"C. Altieri","doi":"10.25145/j.recaesin.2022.85.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"This essay tries to understand one shaping logic by which Anglo-American modernist poets distinguish themselves from their nineteenth century predecessors. Both William James and F.H. Bradley developed ways of thinking that did not divide experience into how subjects process objects. Instead there is, first, experience –an encounter with qualities of events. The mind imposes its interest either in experience, mainly mattering for the person, or for the state of the world it makes present. But for Eliot and the Modernists there was something beyond the person and so a call for impersonality as a potentially fuller, more immediate encounter with the world. Eliot’s concerns for immediate experience operate in The Waste Land primarily to shape how he treats events and voices. But by the end, he cannot but place interpretation against experience in regards to the Thunder. This prepares for Eliot’s separation of humanism from the ways faith requires direct experience.\"","PeriodicalId":273717,"journal":{"name":"Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25145/j.recaesin.2022.85.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"This essay tries to understand one shaping logic by which Anglo-American modernist poets distinguish themselves from their nineteenth century predecessors. Both William James and F.H. Bradley developed ways of thinking that did not divide experience into how subjects process objects. Instead there is, first, experience –an encounter with qualities of events. The mind imposes its interest either in experience, mainly mattering for the person, or for the state of the world it makes present. But for Eliot and the Modernists there was something beyond the person and so a call for impersonality as a potentially fuller, more immediate encounter with the world. Eliot’s concerns for immediate experience operate in The Waste Land primarily to shape how he treats events and voices. But by the end, he cannot but place interpretation against experience in regards to the Thunder. This prepares for Eliot’s separation of humanism from the ways faith requires direct experience."
经验的概念是荒原的基础
本文试图理解英美现代主义诗人区别于他们19世纪前辈的一种形成逻辑。威廉·詹姆斯(William James)和f·h·布拉德利(F.H. Bradley)都发展了不把经验划分为主体如何处理客体的思维方式。相反,首先是经验——与事件的特质相遇。精神要么把它的兴趣强加于经验上,这主要与个人有关,要么强加于它所创造的世界的现状。但对于艾略特和现代主义者来说,还有一些超越人格的东西,所以他们呼吁非人格作为一种与世界更全面、更直接的接触。艾略特在《荒原》中对直接体验的关注主要是为了塑造他对待事件和声音的方式。但到最后,他不得不把对雷霆的解释与经验相对照。这为艾略特将人文主义与信仰需要直接经验的方式分离做了准备
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信