EVALUATION OF ANTERIOR SEGMENT PENTACAM CHANGES BEFORE AND AFTER PHACOEMULSIFICATION VERSUS COMBINED PHACOTRABECULECTOMY IN PRIMARY ANGLE-CLOSURE GLAUCOMA

H. M., Mounir, A., Farouk, M., Ahmad, A.
{"title":"EVALUATION OF ANTERIOR SEGMENT PENTACAM CHANGES BEFORE AND AFTER PHACOEMULSIFICATION VERSUS COMBINED PHACOTRABECULECTOMY IN PRIMARY ANGLE-CLOSURE GLAUCOMA","authors":"H. M., Mounir, A., Farouk, M., Ahmad, A.","doi":"10.21608/ejco.2023.305206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Both Phaco alone and Phaco-trab resulted in changes of the drainage angle, anatomy of the anterior chamber and reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP). The present study aimed to evaluate anterior segment Pentacam changes before and after phacoemulsification versus combined Phacotrabeculectomy in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Methods: This comparative, prospective, randomized controlled interventional study was conducted on 40 cases with primary angle closure glaucoma associated with cataract grade II or more, visual field loss compatible with cataract density admitted and underwent surgery. The study eyes were divided randomly into two groups; group (A) included cases that underwent standard phacoemulsification only while group (B) included cases that underwent combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy and both groups underwent pre and post-operative pentacam. Results: There were non-discernible differences between both groups regarding baseline UCVA, BCVA, K1, K2, K max over time, astigmatism , apex pachymetry, thinnest part corneal volume and anterior chamber depth or the follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. There was discernible difference between both groups regarding baseline anterior chamber angle and chamber volume follow-up at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. No discernible difference was found regarding safety and efficacy between both groups. Conclusions: It's possible that both methods are similarly effective in curing PACG. There are non-significant pentacam changes between both procedures among cornea(k1,k2,k max, apex pachymetry, thinnest part), among anterior chamber (Ac depth, Ac angle, Chamber volume)","PeriodicalId":267572,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejco.2023.305206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Both Phaco alone and Phaco-trab resulted in changes of the drainage angle, anatomy of the anterior chamber and reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP). The present study aimed to evaluate anterior segment Pentacam changes before and after phacoemulsification versus combined Phacotrabeculectomy in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Methods: This comparative, prospective, randomized controlled interventional study was conducted on 40 cases with primary angle closure glaucoma associated with cataract grade II or more, visual field loss compatible with cataract density admitted and underwent surgery. The study eyes were divided randomly into two groups; group (A) included cases that underwent standard phacoemulsification only while group (B) included cases that underwent combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy and both groups underwent pre and post-operative pentacam. Results: There were non-discernible differences between both groups regarding baseline UCVA, BCVA, K1, K2, K max over time, astigmatism , apex pachymetry, thinnest part corneal volume and anterior chamber depth or the follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. There was discernible difference between both groups regarding baseline anterior chamber angle and chamber volume follow-up at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. No discernible difference was found regarding safety and efficacy between both groups. Conclusions: It's possible that both methods are similarly effective in curing PACG. There are non-significant pentacam changes between both procedures among cornea(k1,k2,k max, apex pachymetry, thinnest part), among anterior chamber (Ac depth, Ac angle, Chamber volume)
原发性闭角型青光眼超声乳化术与联合超声小梁切除术前后五他康前段变化的评价
背景:单纯Phaco和Phaco-trab均可改变引流角度、前房解剖结构和降低眼压。本研究旨在评价原发性闭角型青光眼超声乳化术与联合超声小梁切除术前后Pentacam的变化。方法:对40例入院并行手术治疗的原发性闭角型青光眼合并II级及以上白内障,视野丧失与白内障密度相适应的患者进行比较、前瞻性、随机对照研究。研究对象随机分为两组;A组为仅行标准超声乳化术的病例,B组为行超声乳化术联合小梁切除术的病例,两组术前和术后均行五他康治疗。结果:两组在基线UCVA、BCVA、K1、K2、K max随时间变化、散光、尖端视厚、最薄部分角膜体积和前房深度或随访1周、1个月、3个月和6个月时均无明显差异。两组在1个月、3个月和6个月的基线前房角和前房容积随访方面有明显差异。两组之间在安全性和有效性方面没有发现明显的差异。结论:两种方法治疗PACG的疗效可能相似。两种手术间角膜(k1、k2、kmax、尖端厚度、最薄部分)、前房(交流深度、交流角、前房容积)的五卡康变化无显著性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信