AN ANALYSIS THE DIFFERENCES OF THE COMPONENTS IN ENGLISH LESSON PLANNINGS DESIGNED BY INDONESIAN AND THAILAND TEACHERS (A COMPETITIVE-DESCRIPTIVE STUDY TOWARDS ENGLISH LESSON PLANNINGS FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL IN INDONESIA AND THAILAND)

Nalisa Binwang, Fegy Lestari, Restuti Maulida, Iwan Dudy Gunawan
{"title":"AN ANALYSIS THE DIFFERENCES OF THE COMPONENTS IN ENGLISH LESSON PLANNINGS DESIGNED BY INDONESIAN AND THAILAND TEACHERS (A COMPETITIVE-DESCRIPTIVE STUDY TOWARDS ENGLISH LESSON PLANNINGS FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL IN INDONESIA AND THAILAND)","authors":"Nalisa Binwang, Fegy Lestari, Restuti Maulida, Iwan Dudy Gunawan","doi":"10.31980/eealjournal.v4i2.1511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study is aimed at analyzing the differences between components in Indonesia’s and Thailand’s English lesson plantings. It is focused on finding the components that are different in four English lesson plannings. This study aims to give new knowledge and insight for Indonesian and Thai teachers to learn about the differences between one and another, and take the idea to arrange more creative and effective lesson plannings that can motivate students to learn English or other subjects for future classes. This study is a comparative-descriptive study which used Hanafiah & Suhana’s theory for Indonesia’s lesson plannings, and Chitchayawanit’s theory for Thailand’s lesson plannings. The methods used in this study are the comparative method and the descriptive method. The study has presented ten different components in English lesson plannings between Indonesia and Thailand. They are school identity, core competencies (KI), basic competencies (KD), learning standards, learner’s key competencies, desired characteristics, learning concept/essence, core content, learning method, and teaching notes. Furthermore, all of the components that have been written in Indonesia’s and Thailand’s lesson plannings are significant and have their own function and are useful for teachers when they have to design the lesson plannings for each meeting","PeriodicalId":119882,"journal":{"name":"English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal (EEAL Journal)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal (EEAL Journal)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31980/eealjournal.v4i2.1511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study is aimed at analyzing the differences between components in Indonesia’s and Thailand’s English lesson plantings. It is focused on finding the components that are different in four English lesson plannings. This study aims to give new knowledge and insight for Indonesian and Thai teachers to learn about the differences between one and another, and take the idea to arrange more creative and effective lesson plannings that can motivate students to learn English or other subjects for future classes. This study is a comparative-descriptive study which used Hanafiah & Suhana’s theory for Indonesia’s lesson plannings, and Chitchayawanit’s theory for Thailand’s lesson plannings. The methods used in this study are the comparative method and the descriptive method. The study has presented ten different components in English lesson plannings between Indonesia and Thailand. They are school identity, core competencies (KI), basic competencies (KD), learning standards, learner’s key competencies, desired characteristics, learning concept/essence, core content, learning method, and teaching notes. Furthermore, all of the components that have been written in Indonesia’s and Thailand’s lesson plannings are significant and have their own function and are useful for teachers when they have to design the lesson plannings for each meeting
印尼和泰国教师英语教案构成要素差异分析(对印尼和泰国高中英语教案的竞争性描述性研究)
本研究的目的是分析印尼和泰国英语课堂植物成分的差异。它的重点是找出四个英语课程计划的不同组成部分。本研究旨在为印尼和泰国教师提供新的知识和见解,以了解彼此之间的差异,并以此为思路安排更有创意和有效的课程计划,以激励学生在未来的课程中学习英语或其他科目。本研究采用Hanafiah & Suhana的印尼教案理论和Chitchayawanit的泰国教案理论进行比较描述性研究。本研究采用的方法是比较法和描述法。该研究展示了印尼和泰国之间英语课程规划的十个不同组成部分。它们是学校认同、核心能力(KI)、基本能力(KD)、学习标准、学习者关键能力、期望特征、学习理念/本质、核心内容、学习方法和教学笔记。此外,在印度尼西亚和泰国的课程计划中编写的所有组成部分都很重要,有自己的功能,对教师在每次会议上设计课程计划时很有用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信