Race in/and development

Robtel Neajai Pailey
{"title":"Race in/and development","authors":"Robtel Neajai Pailey","doi":"10.4324/9781003037187-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Development discourse owes a great deal to sociological models of modernity. Modern societies are understood to be composed of individuals all of which, regardless of their personal attributes, enjoy equal rights under the law. The distribution of needs through economic and political circuits is supposed to operate in an increasingly universal and objective fashion favouring no-one by reference to particular personal attributes, but by the impersonal demand and supply of the market or by some form of rational meanstested welfare that cover all citizens. The dominant interpretation of modern world development (whether “neo-liberal” and favouring the autonomy of market forces, or a “capabilities approach” and recognising the necessity of political intervention) can be understood as the universalization of these methods and mechanisms of distributing need across all societies and cultures.","PeriodicalId":397022,"journal":{"name":"The Essential Guide to Critical Development Studies","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Essential Guide to Critical Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037187-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Development discourse owes a great deal to sociological models of modernity. Modern societies are understood to be composed of individuals all of which, regardless of their personal attributes, enjoy equal rights under the law. The distribution of needs through economic and political circuits is supposed to operate in an increasingly universal and objective fashion favouring no-one by reference to particular personal attributes, but by the impersonal demand and supply of the market or by some form of rational meanstested welfare that cover all citizens. The dominant interpretation of modern world development (whether “neo-liberal” and favouring the autonomy of market forces, or a “capabilities approach” and recognising the necessity of political intervention) can be understood as the universalization of these methods and mechanisms of distributing need across all societies and cultures.
种族和发展
发展话语在很大程度上归功于现代性的社会学模型。人们认为,现代社会是由个人组成的,所有这些人,无论其个人属性如何,都享有法律规定的平等权利。通过经济和政治循环的需求分配应该以一种日益普遍和客观的方式运作,通过参考特定的个人属性来偏袒任何人,而是通过市场的非个人需求和供应或某种形式的覆盖所有公民的理性手段福利。现代世界发展的主流解释(无论是“新自由主义”和支持市场力量的自主性,还是“能力方法”和承认政治干预的必要性)可以被理解为这些方法和机制在所有社会和文化中分配需求的普遍化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信