On comparing hard and soft fusion of dependent detectors

A. Soriano, L. Vergara, G. Safont, A. Salazar
{"title":"On comparing hard and soft fusion of dependent detectors","authors":"A. Soriano, L. Vergara, G. Safont, A. Salazar","doi":"10.1109/MLSP.2012.6349792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A detection problem, where we have a set of two types of different measurements or modalities of one event, is considered. The optimal fusion rule to combine both modalities in one detector needs the knowledge of the joint statistics of modalities. In many cases we do not know these joint statistics and it is usual to consider independence between modalities for implementing a suboptimal fusion rule. Another suboptimum alternative not much used is to make hard fusion, that is, to thresholding every modality to obtain a set of binary decisions to be fused in only on final decision. In some situations, we can obtain better results using hard fusion instead of soft fusion under the independence assumption. The goal of this paper is to show that the later sentence is generally true.","PeriodicalId":262601,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MLSP.2012.6349792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A detection problem, where we have a set of two types of different measurements or modalities of one event, is considered. The optimal fusion rule to combine both modalities in one detector needs the knowledge of the joint statistics of modalities. In many cases we do not know these joint statistics and it is usual to consider independence between modalities for implementing a suboptimal fusion rule. Another suboptimum alternative not much used is to make hard fusion, that is, to thresholding every modality to obtain a set of binary decisions to be fused in only on final decision. In some situations, we can obtain better results using hard fusion instead of soft fusion under the independence assumption. The goal of this paper is to show that the later sentence is generally true.
依赖探测器硬、软聚变的比较
一个检测问题,其中我们有一组两种类型的不同的测量或模态的一个事件,被考虑。将两种模态结合在一个检测器中的最佳融合规则需要模态联合统计的知识。在许多情况下,我们不知道这些联合统计数据,通常考虑实现次优融合规则的模式之间的独立性。另一种不常用的次优选择是硬融合,即对每个模态进行阈值化,以获得一组只在最终决策中融合的二值决策。在某些情况下,在独立性假设下采用硬融合比软融合可以获得更好的结果。本文的目的是证明后面的句子通常是正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信