Social capital and mental health among Aboriginal Australians, New Australians and Other Australians living in a coastal region

H. Berry
{"title":"Social capital and mental health among Aboriginal Australians, New Australians and Other Australians living in a coastal region","authors":"H. Berry","doi":"10.5172/jamh.8.2.142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Australian mental health policy emphasises the central importance of social inclusion for promoting mental health and treating illness. Social capital is a commonly used concept for describing and evaluating social inclusion, but its relationship to mental health has not been investigated among groups of differing cultural backgrounds in rural and remote Australia, where need is greatest. The aims of this study were to compare levels of social capital and associations with mental health among Aboriginal Australians, New Australians and Other Australians living in a disadvantaged coastal community and to draw implications for policy and service development. Participants were 963 community members, aged 19–97, randomly selected from a socio-economically disadvantaged coastal Australian region, voluntarily completing an anonymous postal survey. Measures of components of social capital were analysed in terms of general psychological distress and happy feelings using multiple hierarchical linear regression modelling. For all groups, higher levels of participation, more positive perceptions about participation, and greater cohesion were associated with less distress and more happy feelings. In multivariate analyses, greater social capital overall was strongly associated with less distress and more happy feelings, the former particularly for Aboriginal Australians. Different aspects of social capital were related to mental health and wellbeing for different groups. Social capital is essential for good mental health and wellbeing but it is neither evenly shared among different groups nor do the same components of social capital matter, or matter to the same degree, among different groups. Social capital may be particularly important (and sensitive) for protecting Aboriginal people against mental health problems. In that these findings suggest approaches to designing policy and services, these must be tested via careful intervention research.","PeriodicalId":358240,"journal":{"name":"Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health","volume":"7 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5172/jamh.8.2.142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

Abstract Australian mental health policy emphasises the central importance of social inclusion for promoting mental health and treating illness. Social capital is a commonly used concept for describing and evaluating social inclusion, but its relationship to mental health has not been investigated among groups of differing cultural backgrounds in rural and remote Australia, where need is greatest. The aims of this study were to compare levels of social capital and associations with mental health among Aboriginal Australians, New Australians and Other Australians living in a disadvantaged coastal community and to draw implications for policy and service development. Participants were 963 community members, aged 19–97, randomly selected from a socio-economically disadvantaged coastal Australian region, voluntarily completing an anonymous postal survey. Measures of components of social capital were analysed in terms of general psychological distress and happy feelings using multiple hierarchical linear regression modelling. For all groups, higher levels of participation, more positive perceptions about participation, and greater cohesion were associated with less distress and more happy feelings. In multivariate analyses, greater social capital overall was strongly associated with less distress and more happy feelings, the former particularly for Aboriginal Australians. Different aspects of social capital were related to mental health and wellbeing for different groups. Social capital is essential for good mental health and wellbeing but it is neither evenly shared among different groups nor do the same components of social capital matter, or matter to the same degree, among different groups. Social capital may be particularly important (and sensitive) for protecting Aboriginal people against mental health problems. In that these findings suggest approaches to designing policy and services, these must be tested via careful intervention research.
生活在沿海地区的澳大利亚土著、新澳大利亚人和其他澳大利亚人的社会资本和心理健康
摘要:澳大利亚心理健康政策强调社会包容对促进心理健康和治疗疾病的核心重要性。社会资本是描述和评价社会包容的常用概念,但其与心理健康的关系尚未在澳大利亚农村和偏远地区不同文化背景的群体中进行调查,那里的需求最大。本研究的目的是比较生活在弱势沿海社区的澳大利亚土著居民、新澳大利亚人和其他澳大利亚人的社会资本水平及其与心理健康的关系,并得出政策和服务发展的影响。参与者是963名社区成员,年龄在19-97岁之间,随机从澳大利亚社会经济状况不佳的沿海地区选择,自愿完成匿名邮政调查。社会资本的组成部分的措施在一般的心理困扰和快乐的感觉方面进行了分析,使用多重层次线性回归模型。对于所有的小组来说,更高的参与度、更积极的参与感和更强的凝聚力都与更少的痛苦和更多的快乐感觉有关。在多变量分析中,总的来说,更大的社会资本与更少的痛苦和更多的快乐感觉密切相关,前者对澳大利亚土著来说尤其如此。社会资本的不同方面与不同群体的心理健康和幸福有关。社会资本对良好的心理健康和幸福至关重要,但它在不同群体中既不是平均分配的,也不是社会资本的相同组成部分在不同群体中重要,或者重要程度相同。社会资本在保护土著人民免受心理健康问题困扰方面可能特别重要(和敏感)。鉴于这些发现提出了设计政策和服务的方法,这些方法必须通过仔细的干预研究进行检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信