A Comprehensive Rail Rate Index for Grain

A. Sparger, M. Prater
{"title":"A Comprehensive Rail Rate Index for Grain","authors":"A. Sparger, M. Prater","doi":"10.5399/OSU/JTRF.51.2.2921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are several annual rail rate indices commonly used to depict changes in the prices paid for rail service. While accurate for general analyses, each of these indices falls short in capturing the three major components of total railroad grain rates – tariff rates, fuel surcharges, and secondary railcar market costs. Grain is a rail commodity whereby bids in the secondary railcar market can affect whether the actual rate paid by shippers is above or below the published tariff rate. The seasonality of rates inherent in grain transportation is captured through the secondary market but is neither contained in other grain rail rate indices nor apparent in annualized data. In addition, most grain rate indices do not include fuel surcharges, which have become a major component of the total rate paid for any rail commodity movement. In this paper, we develop new rail rate indices for unit trains and shuttle trains and compare them against a rail cost index. The new indices are an improvement upon past grain rail rate indices by including information from the secondary rail market, fuel surcharges, and tariff rates into a weekly index between the years 1997 and 2011. The improved indices show a higher level of detail when compared to other annualized indices, allowing for a more thorough analysis of grain rates. These indices show grain rail rates generally higher than do other indices with a notable departure from rail costs at the beginning of the economic recession in 2009. A comparison of the rail indices with rail costs calls into question whether earlier conclusions about rail market power still hold.","PeriodicalId":405535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Transportation Research Forum","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Transportation Research Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5399/OSU/JTRF.51.2.2921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

There are several annual rail rate indices commonly used to depict changes in the prices paid for rail service. While accurate for general analyses, each of these indices falls short in capturing the three major components of total railroad grain rates – tariff rates, fuel surcharges, and secondary railcar market costs. Grain is a rail commodity whereby bids in the secondary railcar market can affect whether the actual rate paid by shippers is above or below the published tariff rate. The seasonality of rates inherent in grain transportation is captured through the secondary market but is neither contained in other grain rail rate indices nor apparent in annualized data. In addition, most grain rate indices do not include fuel surcharges, which have become a major component of the total rate paid for any rail commodity movement. In this paper, we develop new rail rate indices for unit trains and shuttle trains and compare them against a rail cost index. The new indices are an improvement upon past grain rail rate indices by including information from the secondary rail market, fuel surcharges, and tariff rates into a weekly index between the years 1997 and 2011. The improved indices show a higher level of detail when compared to other annualized indices, allowing for a more thorough analysis of grain rates. These indices show grain rail rates generally higher than do other indices with a notable departure from rail costs at the beginning of the economic recession in 2009. A comparison of the rail indices with rail costs calls into question whether earlier conclusions about rail market power still hold.
粮食铁路运价综合指数
有几个年度铁路运价指数通常用来描述铁路服务的价格变化。虽然对一般分析来说是准确的,但这些指数都无法反映铁路粮食总费率的三个主要组成部分——关税费率、燃料附加费和二级铁路车辆市场成本。谷物是一种铁路商品,因此二级铁路市场上的出价会影响托运人支付的实际费率是高于还是低于公布的关税税率。粮食运输中固有的运价季节性是通过二级市场反映出来的,但在其他粮食铁路运价指数中既不包含,在年化数据中也不明显。此外,大多数粮食运价指数不包括燃油附加费,而燃油附加费已成为任何铁路商品运输支付的总费率的主要组成部分。在本文中,我们开发了新的单列列车和穿梭列车的铁路运价指数,并将它们与铁路成本指数进行了比较。在1997年至2011年期间,新指数在过去的粮食铁路价格指数的基础上,将二级铁路市场、燃料附加费、关税等信息纳入每周指数。与其他年化指数相比,改进后的指数显示出更高水平的细节,从而可以更彻底地分析粮食率。这些指数显示,粮食铁路运输价格普遍高于其他指数,与2009年经济衰退初期的铁路运输成本明显不同。将铁路指数与铁路成本进行比较,会让人质疑之前关于铁路市场力量的结论是否仍然成立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信