Is the analysis of stock analysts credible?—Evidence from Chinese listed companies

Cuifeng Wu, Ling Chen
{"title":"Is the analysis of stock analysts credible?—Evidence from Chinese listed companies","authors":"Cuifeng Wu, Ling Chen","doi":"10.1145/3512676.3512686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the continuous development of China's stock market, the report issued by stock analysts is an important basis for institutional investors and individual investors to make investment decisions. Based on the analysts' basic rating of stocks, this paper uses the samples of listed companies on GEM to study whether the analysts' rating of stocks has credibility. The results show that according to analysts' rating report can improve the stock return, that is to say, analysts' rating of GEM stock is trustworthy, and investors can obtain the excess return based on analysts' rating report. The research of this paper enriches the research results of stock analysts on whether the stock rating of listed companies on GEM is credible or not, and also reflects the market efficiency of analysts' stock rating on the other hand. At the same time, the research on the credibility of stock rating can help investors to consider more comprehensively when viewing analysts' rating reports, make more rational investment decisions, and better understand the stock market.","PeriodicalId":281300,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3512676.3512686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the continuous development of China's stock market, the report issued by stock analysts is an important basis for institutional investors and individual investors to make investment decisions. Based on the analysts' basic rating of stocks, this paper uses the samples of listed companies on GEM to study whether the analysts' rating of stocks has credibility. The results show that according to analysts' rating report can improve the stock return, that is to say, analysts' rating of GEM stock is trustworthy, and investors can obtain the excess return based on analysts' rating report. The research of this paper enriches the research results of stock analysts on whether the stock rating of listed companies on GEM is credible or not, and also reflects the market efficiency of analysts' stock rating on the other hand. At the same time, the research on the credibility of stock rating can help investors to consider more comprehensively when viewing analysts' rating reports, make more rational investment decisions, and better understand the stock market.
股票分析师的分析可信吗?——来自中国上市公司的证据
随着中国股市的不断发展,股票分析师发布的报告是机构投资者和个人投资者进行投资决策的重要依据。本文以分析师对股票的基本评级为基础,以创业板上市公司为样本,研究分析师对股票的评级是否具有可信度。结果表明,根据分析师的评级报告可以提高股票收益,即分析师对创业板股票的评级是可信的,投资者可以根据分析师的评级报告获得超额收益。本文的研究丰富了股票分析师对创业板上市公司股票评级是否可信的研究成果,另一方面也反映了分析师股票评级的市场效率。同时,对股票评级可信度的研究可以帮助投资者在查看分析师的评级报告时进行更全面的考虑,做出更理性的投资决策,更好地了解股票市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信