Privacy Smells: Detecting Privacy Problems in Cloud Architectures

Immanuel Kunz, Angelika Schneider, Christian Banse
{"title":"Privacy Smells: Detecting Privacy Problems in Cloud Architectures","authors":"Immanuel Kunz, Angelika Schneider, Christian Banse","doi":"10.1109/TrustCom50675.2020.00178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many organizations are still reluctant to move sensitive data to the cloud. Moreover, data protection regulations have established considerable punishments for violations of privacy and security requirements. Privacy, however, is a concept that is difficult to measure and to demonstrate. While many privacy design strategies, tactics and patterns have been proposed for privacy-preserving system design, it is difficult to evaluate an existing system with regards to whether these strategies have or have not appropriately been implemented. In this paper we propose indicators for a system's non-compliance with privacy design strategies, called privacy smells. To that end we first identify concrete metrics that measure certain aspects of existing privacy design strategies. We then define smells based on these metrics and discuss their limitations and usefulness. We identify these indicators on two levels of a cloud system: the data flow level and the access control level. Using a cloud system built in Microsoft Azure we show how the metrics can be measured technically and discuss the differences to other cloud providers, namely Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud Platform. We argue that while it is difficult to evaluate the privacy-awareness in a cloud system overall, certain privacy aspects in cloud systems can be mapped to useful metrics that can indicate underlying privacy problems. With this approach we aim at enabling cloud users and auditors to detect deep-rooted privacy problems in cloud systems.","PeriodicalId":221956,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TrustCom50675.2020.00178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Many organizations are still reluctant to move sensitive data to the cloud. Moreover, data protection regulations have established considerable punishments for violations of privacy and security requirements. Privacy, however, is a concept that is difficult to measure and to demonstrate. While many privacy design strategies, tactics and patterns have been proposed for privacy-preserving system design, it is difficult to evaluate an existing system with regards to whether these strategies have or have not appropriately been implemented. In this paper we propose indicators for a system's non-compliance with privacy design strategies, called privacy smells. To that end we first identify concrete metrics that measure certain aspects of existing privacy design strategies. We then define smells based on these metrics and discuss their limitations and usefulness. We identify these indicators on two levels of a cloud system: the data flow level and the access control level. Using a cloud system built in Microsoft Azure we show how the metrics can be measured technically and discuss the differences to other cloud providers, namely Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud Platform. We argue that while it is difficult to evaluate the privacy-awareness in a cloud system overall, certain privacy aspects in cloud systems can be mapped to useful metrics that can indicate underlying privacy problems. With this approach we aim at enabling cloud users and auditors to detect deep-rooted privacy problems in cloud systems.
隐私气味:检测云架构中的隐私问题
许多组织仍然不愿意将敏感数据迁移到云端。此外,数据保护条例对违反隐私和安全要求的行为规定了相当大的惩罚。然而,隐私是一个难以衡量和证明的概念。虽然已经提出了许多隐私保护系统设计的策略、策略和模式,但很难评估现有系统是否适当地实施了这些策略。在本文中,我们提出了系统不符合隐私设计策略的指标,称为隐私气味。为此,我们首先确定衡量现有隐私设计策略某些方面的具体指标。然后我们根据这些指标定义气味,并讨论它们的局限性和有用性。我们在云系统的两个级别上确定这些指标:数据流级别和访问控制级别。我们将使用在Microsoft Azure中构建的云系统来展示如何从技术上度量度量指标,并讨论与其他云提供商(即Amazon Web Services和Google cloud Platform)的区别。我们认为,虽然很难全面评估云系统中的隐私意识,但云系统中的某些隐私方面可以映射到可以指示潜在隐私问题的有用指标。通过这种方法,我们的目标是使云用户和审计人员能够发现云系统中根深蒂固的隐私问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信