Assessing Coding Metrics for Parallel Programming of Stream Processing Programs on Multi-cores

Gabriella Andrade, Dalvan Griebler, R. Santos, M. Danelutto, L. G. Fernandes
{"title":"Assessing Coding Metrics for Parallel Programming of Stream Processing Programs on Multi-cores","authors":"Gabriella Andrade, Dalvan Griebler, R. Santos, M. Danelutto, L. G. Fernandes","doi":"10.1109/SEAA53835.2021.00044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the popularization of multi-core architectures, several parallel APIs have emerged, helping to abstract the programming complexity and increasing productivity in application development. Unfortunately, only a few research efforts in this direction managed to show the usability pay-back of the programming abstraction created, because it is not easy and poses many challenges for conducting empirical software engineering. We believe that coding metrics commonly used in software engineering code measurements can give useful indicators on the programming effort of parallel applications and APIs. These metrics were designed for general purposes without considering the evaluation of applications from a specific domain. In this study, we aim to evaluate the feasibility of seven coding metrics to be used in the parallel programming domain. To do so, five stream processing applications implemented with different parallel APIs for multi-cores were considered. Our experiments have shown COCOMO II is a suitable model for evaluating the productivity of different parallel APIs targeting multi-cores on stream processing applications while other metrics are restricted to the code size.","PeriodicalId":435977,"journal":{"name":"2021 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA53835.2021.00044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

From the popularization of multi-core architectures, several parallel APIs have emerged, helping to abstract the programming complexity and increasing productivity in application development. Unfortunately, only a few research efforts in this direction managed to show the usability pay-back of the programming abstraction created, because it is not easy and poses many challenges for conducting empirical software engineering. We believe that coding metrics commonly used in software engineering code measurements can give useful indicators on the programming effort of parallel applications and APIs. These metrics were designed for general purposes without considering the evaluation of applications from a specific domain. In this study, we aim to evaluate the feasibility of seven coding metrics to be used in the parallel programming domain. To do so, five stream processing applications implemented with different parallel APIs for multi-cores were considered. Our experiments have shown COCOMO II is a suitable model for evaluating the productivity of different parallel APIs targeting multi-cores on stream processing applications while other metrics are restricted to the code size.
多核流处理程序并行编程的编码度量评估
随着多核体系结构的普及,出现了一些并行api,它们有助于抽象编程的复杂性,提高应用程序开发的生产力。不幸的是,在这个方向上只有很少的研究努力能够显示所创建的编程抽象的可用性回报,因为它不容易,并且对进行经验软件工程提出了许多挑战。我们相信,通常在软件工程代码度量中使用的编码度量可以为并行应用程序和api的编程工作提供有用的指示。这些度量是为一般目的而设计的,没有考虑对来自特定领域的应用程序进行评估。在这项研究中,我们的目标是评估在并行编程领域使用的七种编码度量的可行性。为此,考虑了五种使用不同并行api实现的多核流处理应用程序。我们的实验表明,COCOMO II是一个合适的模型,用于评估针对多核流处理应用程序的不同并行api的生产率,而其他指标则受代码大小的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信