{"title":"Validating requirements: the evolutionary approach","authors":"M. Lemoine, D. Marre, P. Thuillier, J. Wippler","doi":"10.1109/CMPSAC.1998.716696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Industrial practices in requirements engineering do not give the right place to formal methods. Two main reasons explain why such a failure arises. First of all, formal methods have not promoted a dedicated SLC (software life cycle) which should have been easily integrated within the upper phases of the traditional V-like or Waterfall-like model. A second reason is that formal methods have failed in scaling up. We show how the requirements elicitation phase can take advantage of formal methods. We report the industrial and successful experience (D. Gianazza et al., 1997) undertaken by the STNA, a governmental office responsible for the French ATM (air traffic management) system. We exhibit the evolutionary model which was applied to develop both a validated object oriented model of a particular ATM subsystem, and a formal specification of some of its safety critical parts. We then show that the SRD (Software Requirements Document) is the key of the whole development. Its writing requires a strongly related cooperation of two different teams that are effective actors of the evolutionary model. We conclude the paper by presenting some recommendations.","PeriodicalId":252030,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. The Twenty-Second Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (Compsac '98) (Cat. No.98CB 36241)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. The Twenty-Second Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (Compsac '98) (Cat. No.98CB 36241)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPSAC.1998.716696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Industrial practices in requirements engineering do not give the right place to formal methods. Two main reasons explain why such a failure arises. First of all, formal methods have not promoted a dedicated SLC (software life cycle) which should have been easily integrated within the upper phases of the traditional V-like or Waterfall-like model. A second reason is that formal methods have failed in scaling up. We show how the requirements elicitation phase can take advantage of formal methods. We report the industrial and successful experience (D. Gianazza et al., 1997) undertaken by the STNA, a governmental office responsible for the French ATM (air traffic management) system. We exhibit the evolutionary model which was applied to develop both a validated object oriented model of a particular ATM subsystem, and a formal specification of some of its safety critical parts. We then show that the SRD (Software Requirements Document) is the key of the whole development. Its writing requires a strongly related cooperation of two different teams that are effective actors of the evolutionary model. We conclude the paper by presenting some recommendations.
需求工程中的工业实践并没有给形式化方法提供合适的位置。出现这种失败的原因主要有两个。首先,形式化方法并没有促进专用的SLC(软件生命周期),而SLC本应该很容易地集成到传统的v型或瀑布型模型的上层阶段中。第二个原因是,正式方法在扩大规模方面失败了。我们展示了需求引出阶段如何利用形式化方法。我们报告了由STNA(负责法国空中交通管理系统的政府办公室)承担的工业和成功经验(D. Gianazza et al., 1997)。我们展示了进化模型,该模型用于开发特定ATM子系统的经过验证的面向对象模型,以及其某些安全关键部件的正式规范。然后我们表明SRD(软件需求文档)是整个开发的关键。它的编写需要两个不同团队之间紧密相关的合作,这两个团队是进化模型的有效参与者。最后,我们提出了一些建议。