A Comparison of the Instructor-Trainee Dance Dataset Using Cosine similarity, Euclidean distance, and Angular difference

Thanawat Srikaewsiew, Khatadet Khianchainat, Atima Tharatipyakul, Suporn Pongnumkul, Sarunya Kanjanawattana
{"title":"A Comparison of the Instructor-Trainee Dance Dataset Using Cosine similarity, Euclidean distance, and Angular difference","authors":"Thanawat Srikaewsiew, Khatadet Khianchainat, Atima Tharatipyakul, Suporn Pongnumkul, Sarunya Kanjanawattana","doi":"10.1109/ICSEC56337.2022.10049368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 outbreak has restricted most outdoor activities, leads to increasing interest in exercise at home with online trainers. One issue of online exercise technology is the safety since improper motion might result in injury. As a basis to prevent improper motion, methods for evaluating the motion similarity between an instructor and a trainee are essential. Cosine similarity, Angular difference, and Euclidean distance are three general ways for the motion evaluation. This study aimed to determine the most effective way for analyzing the similarity of human motion on the dataset of instructor-led dances. We first experimented with the data to find the appropriate cut-off value for classifying posture into two classes based on the similarity score. Confusion matrix, precision, recall, F1-score, accuracy of the results were then used to compare the efficiency. We discovered that Cosine similarity had the highest accuracy, 82.77 percent at cut-off 93.","PeriodicalId":430850,"journal":{"name":"2022 26th International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 26th International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSEC56337.2022.10049368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak has restricted most outdoor activities, leads to increasing interest in exercise at home with online trainers. One issue of online exercise technology is the safety since improper motion might result in injury. As a basis to prevent improper motion, methods for evaluating the motion similarity between an instructor and a trainee are essential. Cosine similarity, Angular difference, and Euclidean distance are three general ways for the motion evaluation. This study aimed to determine the most effective way for analyzing the similarity of human motion on the dataset of instructor-led dances. We first experimented with the data to find the appropriate cut-off value for classifying posture into two classes based on the similarity score. Confusion matrix, precision, recall, F1-score, accuracy of the results were then used to compare the efficiency. We discovered that Cosine similarity had the highest accuracy, 82.77 percent at cut-off 93.
用余弦相似度、欧氏距离和角差比较教练-学员舞蹈数据集
新冠肺炎疫情限制了大多数户外活动,人们越来越喜欢在家里通过在线教练锻炼身体。网络运动技术的一个问题是安全性,因为不当的运动可能会导致伤害。作为防止不当动作的基础,评估教练和学员之间动作相似性的方法是必不可少的。余弦相似度、角差和欧氏距离是三种常用的运动评价方法。本研究旨在确定在教练指导的舞蹈数据集上分析人体动作相似性的最有效方法。我们首先对数据进行实验,以找到合适的截断值,以便根据相似度得分将姿势分为两类。然后用混淆矩阵、查准率、查全率、f1评分、查准率对结果进行效率比较。我们发现余弦相似度的准确率最高,截止到93时达到82.77%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信