{"title":"Akomfrah’s Foreigner","authors":"James Harvey","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474423786.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In John Akomfrah’s essay-film, The Nine Muses (2010), the aesthetic paradigms of politics and art are broached so evenly that it is as possible to speak of a ‘cinema of politics’ as it is to speak of a ‘politics of cinema’ – both concepts are equalised, so that each is constitutive of the other. A bricolage of extraordinary intertextuality, Akomfrah’s film is equally concerned with the socio-historical problem of migrant subjectivity and the politico-aesthetic distribution of hierarchies relating to forms and technologies of art. The thematic concern for migration becomes a formal ‘foreignness’, creating a reconfigurative possibility for cinema and its adjacent art forms. Following Rancière’s utopian framing of the wandering ‘foreigner’ (1990: 3), I claim that Akomfrah film ‘persists in the curiosity of his gaze, displaces his angle of vision, reworks the first way of putting together words and images, undoes the certainties of place’ (1990: 3). The foreigner is an urgent political concept at a time of consensus and especially crucial in regards to public responses to mass migration from the Middle East to Europe.","PeriodicalId":126074,"journal":{"name":"Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Art Cinema","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Art Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474423786.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In John Akomfrah’s essay-film, The Nine Muses (2010), the aesthetic paradigms of politics and art are broached so evenly that it is as possible to speak of a ‘cinema of politics’ as it is to speak of a ‘politics of cinema’ – both concepts are equalised, so that each is constitutive of the other. A bricolage of extraordinary intertextuality, Akomfrah’s film is equally concerned with the socio-historical problem of migrant subjectivity and the politico-aesthetic distribution of hierarchies relating to forms and technologies of art. The thematic concern for migration becomes a formal ‘foreignness’, creating a reconfigurative possibility for cinema and its adjacent art forms. Following Rancière’s utopian framing of the wandering ‘foreigner’ (1990: 3), I claim that Akomfrah film ‘persists in the curiosity of his gaze, displaces his angle of vision, reworks the first way of putting together words and images, undoes the certainties of place’ (1990: 3). The foreigner is an urgent political concept at a time of consensus and especially crucial in regards to public responses to mass migration from the Middle East to Europe.
在John Akomfrah的散文电影《九位缪斯》(The Nine Muses, 2010)中,政治和艺术的美学范式被均匀地提出,以至于可以说是“政治的电影”,就像可以说是“电影的政治”一样——这两个概念都是平等的,因此彼此都是相互构成的。阿康弗拉的电影是非凡的互文性的拼凑,它同样关注移民主体性的社会历史问题,以及与艺术形式和技术相关的等级制度的政治美学分布。对移民的主题关注成为一种形式的“异域性”,为电影及其邻近的艺术形式创造了重构的可能性。继ranci对流浪的“外国人”的乌托邦式框架(1990:3)之后,我声称akomfrrah电影“坚持他凝视的好奇心,改变了他的视角,重新设计了将文字和图像结合在一起的第一种方式,解开了地方的确定性”(1990:3)。外国人是一个紧迫的政治概念,在一个共识的时代,特别是在公众对从中东到欧洲的大规模移民的反应方面至关重要。