Investigating similarity measures for locomotor trajectories based on the human perception of differences in motions

Annemarie Turnwald, Sebastian Eger, D. Wollherr
{"title":"Investigating similarity measures for locomotor trajectories based on the human perception of differences in motions","authors":"Annemarie Turnwald, Sebastian Eger, D. Wollherr","doi":"10.1109/ARSO.2015.7428196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Providing robots with the ability to move humanlike is one of the recent challenges for researchers who work on motion planning in human populated environments. Human-like motions help a human interaction partner to intuitively grasp the intention of the robot. However, the problem of validating the degree of human-likeness of a robot motion is rarely addressed, especially for the forward motion during navigation. One approach is using similarity measures to compare the robot trajectories directly with human ones. For this reason, this paper investigates different methods from the time series analysis that can be applied to measure the similarity between trajectories: the average Euclidean distance, the Dynamic Time Warping distance, and the Longest Common Subsequence. We aim to identify the measure that performs the same way as a human who rates the similarity. Thus, the evaluation of the methods is based on a questionnaire that examines the human perception of differences between walking motions. It is concluded that the human similarity perception is reproduced best by using the Dynamic Time Warping and comparing the derivatives of the path and velocity profiles instead of the absolute values.","PeriodicalId":211781,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2015.7428196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Providing robots with the ability to move humanlike is one of the recent challenges for researchers who work on motion planning in human populated environments. Human-like motions help a human interaction partner to intuitively grasp the intention of the robot. However, the problem of validating the degree of human-likeness of a robot motion is rarely addressed, especially for the forward motion during navigation. One approach is using similarity measures to compare the robot trajectories directly with human ones. For this reason, this paper investigates different methods from the time series analysis that can be applied to measure the similarity between trajectories: the average Euclidean distance, the Dynamic Time Warping distance, and the Longest Common Subsequence. We aim to identify the measure that performs the same way as a human who rates the similarity. Thus, the evaluation of the methods is based on a questionnaire that examines the human perception of differences between walking motions. It is concluded that the human similarity perception is reproduced best by using the Dynamic Time Warping and comparing the derivatives of the path and velocity profiles instead of the absolute values.
基于人类对运动差异的感知,研究运动轨迹的相似性度量
为机器人提供像人类一样移动的能力是研究人员在人类密集环境中运动规划的最新挑战之一。类人动作帮助人类交互伙伴直观地掌握机器人的意图。然而,验证机器人运动与人类相似程度的问题很少得到解决,特别是在导航过程中的向前运动。一种方法是使用相似度来直接比较机器人和人类的轨迹。因此,本文研究了不同于时间序列分析的方法,可以用来测量轨迹之间的相似性:平均欧几里得距离、动态时间翘曲距离和最长公共子序列。我们的目标是确定一种与人类评估相似性的方式相同的测量方法。因此,对这些方法的评估是基于一份调查问卷,该问卷调查了人类对行走运动之间差异的感知。结果表明,采用动态时间翘曲方法,比较路径和速度曲线的导数值,而不是绝对值,可以更好地再现人类的相似感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信