Indigenous data in effective humanitarian responses

Wakanyi Hoffman
{"title":"Indigenous data in effective humanitarian responses","authors":"Wakanyi Hoffman","doi":"10.21153/thl2021art1505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nIn the international humanitarian landscape, crisis interventions are deployed based on a long-standing working culture that presupposes that local authorities are usually overwhelmed during a crisis and unable to mobilise local capacity. Thus, external human resource mobilisation is necessary. However, this may only be true in various instances, such as natural disasters, where rapid response is needed to extinguish further harm to human life. In most cases, there are no mechanisms to make prior assessments that can inform decision-makers about the kind of international assistance needed in the local context. \nThis is because existing data for the availability of resources is produced mainly by international aid agencies and their governing political institutions. This database of knowledge, which leans heavily on a post-colonial Anglocentric viewpoint about ‘best practices’, is used as the baseline to assess the ability of potential partners to mobilise their resources, while failing to include the capacity of local agents to determine what capacity exists in a particular context, what they are already capable of delivering and how best to support their response system (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction [UNISDR] 2008). \nHowever, as access to digital communication devices and other globally useful technology in resource-constrained rural settings continues to emerge, this may soon change. This paper explores the ways in which Indigenous and local knowledge should contribute to the exploration of intelligent and sustainable solutions that are well-suited within the local context to mitigate and understand humanitarian crises before, during and after they occur, and how to curate, analyse and use local data and knowledge systems to create innovations that are sustainable and adaptive to the priorities of the local population. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":151936,"journal":{"name":"The Humanitarian Leader","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Humanitarian Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21153/thl2021art1505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the international humanitarian landscape, crisis interventions are deployed based on a long-standing working culture that presupposes that local authorities are usually overwhelmed during a crisis and unable to mobilise local capacity. Thus, external human resource mobilisation is necessary. However, this may only be true in various instances, such as natural disasters, where rapid response is needed to extinguish further harm to human life. In most cases, there are no mechanisms to make prior assessments that can inform decision-makers about the kind of international assistance needed in the local context. This is because existing data for the availability of resources is produced mainly by international aid agencies and their governing political institutions. This database of knowledge, which leans heavily on a post-colonial Anglocentric viewpoint about ‘best practices’, is used as the baseline to assess the ability of potential partners to mobilise their resources, while failing to include the capacity of local agents to determine what capacity exists in a particular context, what they are already capable of delivering and how best to support their response system (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction [UNISDR] 2008). However, as access to digital communication devices and other globally useful technology in resource-constrained rural settings continues to emerge, this may soon change. This paper explores the ways in which Indigenous and local knowledge should contribute to the exploration of intelligent and sustainable solutions that are well-suited within the local context to mitigate and understand humanitarian crises before, during and after they occur, and how to curate, analyse and use local data and knowledge systems to create innovations that are sustainable and adaptive to the priorities of the local population.
有效人道主义反应中的土著数据
在国际人道主义领域,危机干预措施的部署是基于一种长期存在的工作文化,这种文化假定地方当局在危机期间通常不堪重负,无法调动地方能力。因此,调动外部人力资源是必要的。然而,这可能只在各种情况下是正确的,例如在自然灾害中,需要迅速作出反应以消除对人类生命的进一步伤害。在大多数情况下,没有任何机制可以事先作出评估,使决策者了解在当地情况下需要什么样的国际援助。这是因为现有的资源可用性数据主要是由国际援助机构及其执政政治机构编制的。这一知识数据库严重依赖于后殖民时期以英国为中心的“最佳实践”观点,被用作评估潜在合作伙伴调动资源能力的基准,而没有包括当地机构的能力,以确定在特定情况下存在的能力、他们已经能够提供的能力以及如何最好地支持他们的响应系统(联合国国际减灾战略[UNISDR] 2008)。然而,随着在资源有限的农村环境中不断出现数字通信设备和其他全球有用技术,这种情况可能很快就会改变。本文探讨了土著和地方知识如何有助于探索适合当地背景的智能和可持续解决方案,以减轻和理解人道主义危机发生之前,期间和之后,以及如何策划,分析和使用当地数据和知识系统来创造可持续的创新,并适应当地人口的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信