Wrestling with Gender: Constructing Masculinity by Refusing to Wrestle Women

Deborah L. Brake
{"title":"Wrestling with Gender: Constructing Masculinity by Refusing to Wrestle Women","authors":"Deborah L. Brake","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/7vmy8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In February of 2011, an Iowa high school boy captured national attention when he refused to wrestle a girl at the state championship meet. The media shaped the story into a tale that honored the boy for sacrificing personal gain out of a moral imperative to “never hurt a girl.” Unpacking this incident reveals several “fault lines” in U.S. culture that often derail gender equality projects: (1) religion/morality is interposed as an oppositional and equally weighty social value that neutralizes an equality claim; (2) the agency of persons supporting traditional gender norms is assumed, while the agency of persons contesting them is questioned; (3) opting out or “leveling down” is employed to reinforce status hierarchies while maintaining a semblance of formal equality (neither boy nor girl wrestles); and (4) de-contextualized strands of feminist theory are appropriated and co-opted in service of the existing gender order. This paper asks, what happens when sex equality law is interjected into this narrative? After examining the anatomy of the backlash to the threat to the gender order posed by the entry of girls into wrestling, this paper constructs an argument that Title IX obligates schools and athletic associations to take measures designed to deter gender-based forfeitures that deprive girls of athletic opportunity. It then explores a tougher question: does the introduction of a sex equality claim disrupt the conventional understandings of gender that emerged from this narrative? I ultimately contend that law has a potentially useful role to play in subverting the gender order, but that to do so it must engage the crucial dynamic at the heart of forfeiture incident: the construction of masculinity, both for the boy who forfeited and for the sport of wrestling itself. Feminist legal strategies must contend with how masculinity is constructed and valued for the boys and men who play sports in order to further advance the cause of girls’ and women’s equality in sports.","PeriodicalId":198476,"journal":{"name":"Nevada Law Journal","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nevada Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/7vmy8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In February of 2011, an Iowa high school boy captured national attention when he refused to wrestle a girl at the state championship meet. The media shaped the story into a tale that honored the boy for sacrificing personal gain out of a moral imperative to “never hurt a girl.” Unpacking this incident reveals several “fault lines” in U.S. culture that often derail gender equality projects: (1) religion/morality is interposed as an oppositional and equally weighty social value that neutralizes an equality claim; (2) the agency of persons supporting traditional gender norms is assumed, while the agency of persons contesting them is questioned; (3) opting out or “leveling down” is employed to reinforce status hierarchies while maintaining a semblance of formal equality (neither boy nor girl wrestles); and (4) de-contextualized strands of feminist theory are appropriated and co-opted in service of the existing gender order. This paper asks, what happens when sex equality law is interjected into this narrative? After examining the anatomy of the backlash to the threat to the gender order posed by the entry of girls into wrestling, this paper constructs an argument that Title IX obligates schools and athletic associations to take measures designed to deter gender-based forfeitures that deprive girls of athletic opportunity. It then explores a tougher question: does the introduction of a sex equality claim disrupt the conventional understandings of gender that emerged from this narrative? I ultimately contend that law has a potentially useful role to play in subverting the gender order, but that to do so it must engage the crucial dynamic at the heart of forfeiture incident: the construction of masculinity, both for the boy who forfeited and for the sport of wrestling itself. Feminist legal strategies must contend with how masculinity is constructed and valued for the boys and men who play sports in order to further advance the cause of girls’ and women’s equality in sports.
与性别角力:通过拒绝与女性角力来构建男子气概
2011年2月,爱荷华州一名高中男生在州冠军赛上拒绝与一名女生摔跤,引起了全国的关注。媒体把这个故事塑造成一个故事,赞美这个男孩为了“永远不要伤害女孩”的道德责任而牺牲了个人利益。对这一事件的剖析揭示了美国文化中的几个“断层线”,这些断层线经常破坏性别平等项目:(1)宗教/道德被作为一种对立的、同样重要的社会价值介入,抵消了平等主张;(2)假设支持传统性别规范的人的能动性,而质疑反对传统性别规范的人的能动性;(3)选择退出或“降级”是为了加强地位等级,同时保持表面上的正式平等(男孩和女孩都不摔跤);(4)去语境化的女权主义理论被挪用和吸收,以服务于现有的性别秩序。本文提出的问题是,当性别平等法被插入到这种叙事中时,会发生什么?在剖析了女生参加摔跤运动对性别秩序的威胁所带来的反弹之后,本文构建了一个论点,即第九条规定学校和体育协会有义务采取措施,阻止基于性别的没收,剥夺女生的运动机会。然后,它探讨了一个更棘手的问题:性别平等主张的引入是否破坏了从这种叙述中产生的对性别的传统理解?我最终认为,法律在颠覆性别秩序方面发挥着潜在的有益作用,但要做到这一点,它必须涉及没收事件核心的关键动态:男子气概的构建,无论是对被没收的男孩还是对摔跤运动本身。女权主义的法律策略必须与男子气概的构建和价值相抗衡,以进一步推进女孩和妇女在体育运动中的平等事业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信