The Play of Words / Representations / Meanings

{"title":"The Play of Words / Representations / Meanings","authors":"","doi":"10.22394/0869-5377-2022-4-51-55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article introduses proceedings of the international scientific conference “Puns, Neologisms, Reservations, and Shifts in Russian Culture in the 18th–20th Centuries,” held at the Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences at St. Petersburg State University on November 27–28, 2020. It took place in the interval between the first and the second wave of the pandemic, when the very possibility of a face-to-face meeting of speakers seemed unique. The article opens with a description of the specifics of the mixed format in which the conference took place, and then reconstructs the discussion among its participants, which greatly expanded the scope of the research of the problem. While the initial intention was to focus on Russian culture, limiting the discussion to the period between the reforms of Peter the Great and the present, as the discussion unfolded, it became clear to the participants that there is no Russian specificity in this project. On the contrary, it is much more interesting and relevant in a broader, sociocultural context. As for the timeframes, they were removed in order to provide an opportunity to talk about the play of words and images, having the opportunity to resort to broad and quite unexpected comparisons and analogies.\nPhilologists, philosophers, cultural anthropologists, historians, art historians, specialists in visual studies, history and theory of fashion saw in comparative typology a common ground for dialogue in which it was possible to talk about the practices of word and image play, namely puns, neologisms, communication disorders and shifts. We were able to distinguish three conceptual fields in which the polemic unfolded: the play of words, the play of representations, and the play of meanings.","PeriodicalId":227990,"journal":{"name":"POWER AND ADMINISTRATION IN THE EAST OF RUSSIA","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POWER AND ADMINISTRATION IN THE EAST OF RUSSIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2022-4-51-55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article introduses proceedings of the international scientific conference “Puns, Neologisms, Reservations, and Shifts in Russian Culture in the 18th–20th Centuries,” held at the Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences at St. Petersburg State University on November 27–28, 2020. It took place in the interval between the first and the second wave of the pandemic, when the very possibility of a face-to-face meeting of speakers seemed unique. The article opens with a description of the specifics of the mixed format in which the conference took place, and then reconstructs the discussion among its participants, which greatly expanded the scope of the research of the problem. While the initial intention was to focus on Russian culture, limiting the discussion to the period between the reforms of Peter the Great and the present, as the discussion unfolded, it became clear to the participants that there is no Russian specificity in this project. On the contrary, it is much more interesting and relevant in a broader, sociocultural context. As for the timeframes, they were removed in order to provide an opportunity to talk about the play of words and images, having the opportunity to resort to broad and quite unexpected comparisons and analogies. Philologists, philosophers, cultural anthropologists, historians, art historians, specialists in visual studies, history and theory of fashion saw in comparative typology a common ground for dialogue in which it was possible to talk about the practices of word and image play, namely puns, neologisms, communication disorders and shifts. We were able to distinguish three conceptual fields in which the polemic unfolded: the play of words, the play of representations, and the play of meanings.
文字游戏/表现/意义
本文介绍了2020年11月27日至28日在圣彼得堡国立大学文理学院举行的国际科学会议“18 - 20世纪俄罗斯文化中的双关语、新词、保留和变化”的会议记录。会议是在大流行病第一波和第二波之间的间隔期间举行的,当时举行一次面对面会议的可能性似乎是独一无二的。文章首先描述了会议举行的混合形式的细节,然后重建了与会者之间的讨论,这极大地扩展了问题的研究范围。虽然最初的意图是关注俄罗斯文化,将讨论限制在彼得大帝改革和现在之间的时期,但随着讨论的展开,参与者清楚地意识到这个项目没有俄罗斯的特殊性。相反,在更广泛的社会文化背景下,它更有趣,更相关。至于时间框架,它们被删除是为了提供一个机会来谈论文字和图像的游戏,有机会求助于广泛的和意想不到的比较和类比。语言学家、哲学家、文化人类学家、历史学家、艺术史学家、视觉研究、历史和时尚理论专家在比较类型学中看到了对话的共同基础,在这个基础上,人们可以谈论文字和图像游戏的实践,即双关语、新词、沟通障碍和转变。我们能够区分出争论展开的三个概念领域:文字的游戏,表征的游戏和意义的游戏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信