{"title":"Creation of Tantric Sacred Spaces in Eastern Central Asia","authors":"C. Meinert","doi":"10.1163/9789004417731_012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The spread of Tantric Buddhism in Eastern Central Asia between the 10th and early 13th centuries is well documented in textual and visual evidence from various sites. Among the earliest dateable textual evidences of Tantric Buddhism in Eastern Central Asia are the Tibetan Dunhuang manuscripts from the second half of the 10th century, as recent palaeographic research by Sam van Schaik and Jacob Dalton shows.1 So far, these manuscripts have been used mostly by scholars of Tibetan Studies, for whom they are seen as constituing auxiliary materials to the reconstruction of early Tibetan Buddhist history— particularly valuable due to the lack of equivalent materials for this period deriving from Tibet itself. However, to my knowledge none have so far looked at Eastern Central Asian Buddhism as an integrated system in itself, which also influenced the development of Buddhism in Tibet (and in the Sinitic world as well). As an example, in my earlier work, I examine individual interesting manuscripts from the Dunhuang Collection, without addressing the larger context in which these were actually produced. I failed to question what these manuscripts actually meant for the local Eastern Central Asian communities themselves.2 However, here I suggest that with a deeper knowledge of the spread of","PeriodicalId":221661,"journal":{"name":"Buddhism in Central Asia I","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buddhism in Central Asia I","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004417731_012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
The spread of Tantric Buddhism in Eastern Central Asia between the 10th and early 13th centuries is well documented in textual and visual evidence from various sites. Among the earliest dateable textual evidences of Tantric Buddhism in Eastern Central Asia are the Tibetan Dunhuang manuscripts from the second half of the 10th century, as recent palaeographic research by Sam van Schaik and Jacob Dalton shows.1 So far, these manuscripts have been used mostly by scholars of Tibetan Studies, for whom they are seen as constituing auxiliary materials to the reconstruction of early Tibetan Buddhist history— particularly valuable due to the lack of equivalent materials for this period deriving from Tibet itself. However, to my knowledge none have so far looked at Eastern Central Asian Buddhism as an integrated system in itself, which also influenced the development of Buddhism in Tibet (and in the Sinitic world as well). As an example, in my earlier work, I examine individual interesting manuscripts from the Dunhuang Collection, without addressing the larger context in which these were actually produced. I failed to question what these manuscripts actually meant for the local Eastern Central Asian communities themselves.2 However, here I suggest that with a deeper knowledge of the spread of
从10世纪到13世纪早期,密宗佛教在中亚东部的传播在各种地点的文字和视觉证据中得到了很好的记录。Sam van Schaik和Jacob Dalton最近的古生物学研究表明,中亚东部最早的可确定日期的密宗佛教文本证据是10世纪下半叶的西藏敦煌手稿到目前为止,这些手稿主要被藏学学者使用,对他们来说,它们被视为重建早期藏传佛教历史的辅助材料-由于缺乏来自西藏本身的这一时期的等效材料,因此特别有价值。然而,据我所知,到目前为止,还没有人将中亚东部的佛教视为一个完整的系统,这也影响了西藏佛教的发展(以及中国的佛教世界)。例如,在我早期的工作中,我检查了敦煌收藏中个别有趣的手稿,而没有解决这些手稿实际产生的更大背景。我没有质疑这些手稿对当地的东中亚社区本身到底意味着什么不过,在这里我建议,随着对传播的认识加深