G. Ejebe, G. Irisarri, S. Mokhtari, O. Obadina, P. Ristanovic, J. Tong
{"title":"Methods for contingency screening and ranking for voltage stability analysis of power systems","authors":"G. Ejebe, G. Irisarri, S. Mokhtari, O. Obadina, P. Ristanovic, J. Tong","doi":"10.1109/PICA.1995.515191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The comparison of performance of four methods for contingency screening and ranking for voltage stability analysis is presented. Three of the methods are existing methods, while a new method is proposed. The performance of all the methods is carried out by comparing with full solutions using a continuation power flow. It is shown that the newly proposed method has the best performance in terms of accuracy and computation time. All the methods are evaluated using a 234-bus system. Additional results using the best performing method are included for a 901-bus power system.","PeriodicalId":294493,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Power Industry Computer Applications Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"157","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Power Industry Computer Applications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICA.1995.515191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 157
Abstract
The comparison of performance of four methods for contingency screening and ranking for voltage stability analysis is presented. Three of the methods are existing methods, while a new method is proposed. The performance of all the methods is carried out by comparing with full solutions using a continuation power flow. It is shown that the newly proposed method has the best performance in terms of accuracy and computation time. All the methods are evaluated using a 234-bus system. Additional results using the best performing method are included for a 901-bus power system.