Methods for contingency screening and ranking for voltage stability analysis of power systems

G. Ejebe, G. Irisarri, S. Mokhtari, O. Obadina, P. Ristanovic, J. Tong
{"title":"Methods for contingency screening and ranking for voltage stability analysis of power systems","authors":"G. Ejebe, G. Irisarri, S. Mokhtari, O. Obadina, P. Ristanovic, J. Tong","doi":"10.1109/PICA.1995.515191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The comparison of performance of four methods for contingency screening and ranking for voltage stability analysis is presented. Three of the methods are existing methods, while a new method is proposed. The performance of all the methods is carried out by comparing with full solutions using a continuation power flow. It is shown that the newly proposed method has the best performance in terms of accuracy and computation time. All the methods are evaluated using a 234-bus system. Additional results using the best performing method are included for a 901-bus power system.","PeriodicalId":294493,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Power Industry Computer Applications Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"157","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Power Industry Computer Applications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICA.1995.515191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 157

Abstract

The comparison of performance of four methods for contingency screening and ranking for voltage stability analysis is presented. Three of the methods are existing methods, while a new method is proposed. The performance of all the methods is carried out by comparing with full solutions using a continuation power flow. It is shown that the newly proposed method has the best performance in terms of accuracy and computation time. All the methods are evaluated using a 234-bus system. Additional results using the best performing method are included for a 901-bus power system.
电力系统电压稳定性分析应急筛选和排序方法
对电压稳定分析中4种应急筛选排序方法的性能进行了比较。其中三种方法是现有方法,提出了一种新的方法。通过与使用连续潮流的全解进行比较,验证了所有方法的性能。结果表明,该方法在精度和计算时间方面都具有较好的性能。使用234总线系统对所有方法进行了评估。使用最佳性能方法的其他结果包括901总线电力系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信