Comparison of relational methods and attribute-based methods for data mining in intelligent systems

Boris Kovalerchuk, E. Vityaev
{"title":"Comparison of relational methods and attribute-based methods for data mining in intelligent systems","authors":"Boris Kovalerchuk, E. Vityaev","doi":"10.1109/ISIC.1999.796648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of the data mining methods in real-world intelligent systems are attribute-based machine learning methods such as neural networks, nearest neighbors and decision trees. They are relatively simple, efficient, and can handle noisy data. However, these methods have two strong limitations: (1) a limited form of expressing the background knowledge and (2) the lack of relations other than \"object-attribute\" makes the concept description language inappropriate for some applications. Relational hybrid data mining methods based on first-order logic were developed to meet these challenges. In the paper they are compared with neural networks and other benchmark methods. The comparison shows several advantages of relational methods.","PeriodicalId":300130,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control Intelligent Systems and Semiotics (Cat. No.99CH37014)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control Intelligent Systems and Semiotics (Cat. No.99CH37014)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIC.1999.796648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Most of the data mining methods in real-world intelligent systems are attribute-based machine learning methods such as neural networks, nearest neighbors and decision trees. They are relatively simple, efficient, and can handle noisy data. However, these methods have two strong limitations: (1) a limited form of expressing the background knowledge and (2) the lack of relations other than "object-attribute" makes the concept description language inappropriate for some applications. Relational hybrid data mining methods based on first-order logic were developed to meet these challenges. In the paper they are compared with neural networks and other benchmark methods. The comparison shows several advantages of relational methods.
智能系统数据挖掘中关系方法与基于属性方法的比较
在现实世界的智能系统中,大多数数据挖掘方法都是基于属性的机器学习方法,如神经网络、最近邻和决策树。它们相对简单、高效,并且可以处理噪声数据。然而,这些方法有两个很强的局限性:(1)表达背景知识的形式有限;(2)除了“对象-属性”之外缺乏关系,使得概念描述语言不适合某些应用。基于一阶逻辑的关系混合数据挖掘方法应运而生。本文将它们与神经网络和其他基准方法进行了比较。对比显示了关系型方法的几个优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信