{"title":"Characteristics of cost-efficient fertilization plans at the farm level","authors":"M. Tröster, J. Sauer","doi":"10.1080/27685241.2022.2147869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Fertilization accounts for a significant share of the costs of crop production. Farmers therefore aim to find cost-efficient fertilization plans, which is a complex and recurring optimization problem. This study analyses whole-farm fertilization plans to generate a deeper economic understanding of cost-efficient fertilization plans on farm level. Various fertilizer plans, obtained by a choice experiment, were grouped into “cost-efficient”, “average” and “cost-inefficient” solutions, using cluster analysis. Group differences were analysed by t-test to reveal the characteristics of cost-efficient solutions. In addition, the fertilizer optimization system IoFarm was used to simulate the effects of extreme changes in farm constellations on the fertilizer plan. Our results show that certain fertilizers are significantly more common in cost-efficient fertilizer plans: diammonium phosphate covers 81.8% of the phosphorus and 21.7% of the nitrogen supply; granular potash covers 100% of the potash supply. Compared to cost-efficient fertilizer plans, inefficient ones have higher annual surpluses of sulphur (+45.4 kg ha−1) and potash (+9.8 kg ha−1), incurring costs and impacting sustainability. Application costs represent a proportion of 5.2% of total costs, but play a minor role compared to other factors. Fertilizer prices were identified as the largest factor influencing the fertilizer plan. The results show that cost-efficient fertilizer plans are at the same time more sustainable, which also demonstrates the societal benefit of this study. The study provides a new and important contribution to the understanding of cost-efficient fertilizer plans at the farm level. Farmers benefit significantly from this contribution, as it shows opportunities to increase cost-efficiency.","PeriodicalId":211218,"journal":{"name":"NJAS: Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NJAS: Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27685241.2022.2147869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Fertilization accounts for a significant share of the costs of crop production. Farmers therefore aim to find cost-efficient fertilization plans, which is a complex and recurring optimization problem. This study analyses whole-farm fertilization plans to generate a deeper economic understanding of cost-efficient fertilization plans on farm level. Various fertilizer plans, obtained by a choice experiment, were grouped into “cost-efficient”, “average” and “cost-inefficient” solutions, using cluster analysis. Group differences were analysed by t-test to reveal the characteristics of cost-efficient solutions. In addition, the fertilizer optimization system IoFarm was used to simulate the effects of extreme changes in farm constellations on the fertilizer plan. Our results show that certain fertilizers are significantly more common in cost-efficient fertilizer plans: diammonium phosphate covers 81.8% of the phosphorus and 21.7% of the nitrogen supply; granular potash covers 100% of the potash supply. Compared to cost-efficient fertilizer plans, inefficient ones have higher annual surpluses of sulphur (+45.4 kg ha−1) and potash (+9.8 kg ha−1), incurring costs and impacting sustainability. Application costs represent a proportion of 5.2% of total costs, but play a minor role compared to other factors. Fertilizer prices were identified as the largest factor influencing the fertilizer plan. The results show that cost-efficient fertilizer plans are at the same time more sustainable, which also demonstrates the societal benefit of this study. The study provides a new and important contribution to the understanding of cost-efficient fertilizer plans at the farm level. Farmers benefit significantly from this contribution, as it shows opportunities to increase cost-efficiency.
施肥占作物生产成本的很大一部分。因此,农民的目标是找到具有成本效益的施肥方案,这是一个复杂且反复出现的优化问题。本研究分析了整个农场的施肥计划,以在农场层面上对成本效益施肥计划产生更深入的经济理解。通过选择实验获得的各种肥料方案,使用聚类分析将其分为“成本效益”、“平均”和“成本效率低下”的解决方案。采用t检验分析组间差异,揭示成本效益解决方案的特点。此外,利用肥料优化系统IoFarm模拟了农场星座极端变化对肥料计划的影响。我们的研究结果表明,某些肥料在成本效益肥料计划中更为常见:磷酸二铵覆盖了81.8%的磷和21.7%的氮供应;粒状钾肥占钾肥供应的100%。与具有成本效益的肥料计划相比,低效肥料计划的年硫(+45.4 kg hm2 - 1)和钾肥(+9.8 kg hm2 - 1)过剩更高,从而产生成本并影响可持续性。申请费用占总费用的5.2%,但与其他因素相比作用较小。肥料价格被确定为影响肥料计划的最大因素。结果表明,具有成本效益的肥料计划同时更具可持续性,这也证明了本研究的社会效益。该研究为了解农场层面的成本效益肥料计划提供了新的重要贡献。农民从这一贡献中受益匪浅,因为它显示了提高成本效益的机会。