Marlow, Socrates, and an Ancient Quarrel in Chance

D. Baldwin
{"title":"Marlow, Socrates, and an Ancient Quarrel in Chance","authors":"D. Baldwin","doi":"10.1163/9789004308992_005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ONE OF THE PECULIARITIES of Chance - in addition to its narrative complexity, which so many critical essays on the novel use as their starting point - is its striking reference to the figure of Socrates. He is mentioned in the first chapter not once, but twice, first as a physical likeness to a shipping master, and then again as a temperamental contrast to the man's straightforward rhetorical manner. The shipping master then abruptly disappears from the tale, and the Classical allusion is easily forgotten or dismissed as a stray detail from an awkward chapter written long before the rest of the novel. As Conrad himself said of the chapter, in a letter to Pinker: \"it did not belong to that novel - but to some other novel which will never be written now I guess\" (CL5 229). Yet we should not be too quick to ignore the chapter's references to Socrates, icon of the Western philosophical tradition. For Socrates' \"exasperating\" manner of conversation continues to reverberate through the arguably exasperating narrative that follows, and his echo turns out to be found less in the fleeting shipping master, than in the voice that introduced the allusion, the fellow with \"the habit of pursuing general ideas in a peculiar manner, between jest and earnest\" (23) - that is, in Marlow himself.This essay will suggest that Conrad sets up Marlow in Chance as a Socrates figure, fostering dialectical difficulty, curiosity and puzzlement in his manner of storytelling. But it will also emphasize a deeper complexity: Conrad importantly modifies his Marlovian Socrates from the familiar philosophical model in order to recast the search for truth on his own artistic terms. For Socrates famously rejected the poets or imaginative writers - their attachment to particularity, their fostering of passion, their defence of the human - but these turn out to be central features of Marlow's narrative activity. Indeed, Conrad's inversion of what is valued in the search for truth, conveyed in the playful guise of the Classical allusion, calls up the ancient quarrel between the philosophers and the poets, a quarrel implicit in Conrad's artistic credo as early as the Preface to The Nigger of the 'Narcissus\" (1897) where hebegins by opposing his artistic approach to truth to that of the \"thinker\" or the \"scientist.\" In Chance, he again takes up this gauntlet. Thus, while the allusions to Socrates signal a search for truth and dialectical activity to that end, the truths offered are found not in abstract ideas, but in the experience of individuals and in the affective sympathies and solidarities between them.Treating Conrad's fiction as dialectical, and in the service of humanistic ends, is not new. Analyses of narrative method by Jeremy Hawthorn and Jakob Lothe reveal the intricacy and deliberateness of Conrad's art, and Richard Ambrosini's bold and poignant study, Conrad's Fiction as Critical Discourse, show how Conrad's narrative explorations were informed by a consistent integrity of vision. Conrad's classical debt, on the other hand, has been pursued since Eloise Knapp Hay's classic work of Aristotelian political analysis and Lilian Feder's essay on Virgil and \"Heart of Darkness,\" recently further extended by Terence Bowers. Even more recently, Alexia Hannis has analyzed Conrad's debt to Aristotle. But considering how both of these aspects of Conrad's art come together in Chance helps us see the philosophical engagement and depth of his artistic vision. Of course, this is not to deny that the novel also engaged the literary genres and issues of its time, as many helpful studies have variously illuminated,1 but only to suggest that it participates equally in an even more enduring conversation.The succinct ease of the novel's allusion to Socrates reminds us of what would have been obvious to readers in 1913 when the Classics were a constitutive part of British and European education, including Conrad's. Because of familial and political upheavals and personal illhealth, Conrad was privately tutored as well as formally schooled. …","PeriodicalId":394409,"journal":{"name":"The Conradian : the Journal of the Joseph Conrad Society","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Conradian : the Journal of the Joseph Conrad Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004308992_005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ONE OF THE PECULIARITIES of Chance - in addition to its narrative complexity, which so many critical essays on the novel use as their starting point - is its striking reference to the figure of Socrates. He is mentioned in the first chapter not once, but twice, first as a physical likeness to a shipping master, and then again as a temperamental contrast to the man's straightforward rhetorical manner. The shipping master then abruptly disappears from the tale, and the Classical allusion is easily forgotten or dismissed as a stray detail from an awkward chapter written long before the rest of the novel. As Conrad himself said of the chapter, in a letter to Pinker: "it did not belong to that novel - but to some other novel which will never be written now I guess" (CL5 229). Yet we should not be too quick to ignore the chapter's references to Socrates, icon of the Western philosophical tradition. For Socrates' "exasperating" manner of conversation continues to reverberate through the arguably exasperating narrative that follows, and his echo turns out to be found less in the fleeting shipping master, than in the voice that introduced the allusion, the fellow with "the habit of pursuing general ideas in a peculiar manner, between jest and earnest" (23) - that is, in Marlow himself.This essay will suggest that Conrad sets up Marlow in Chance as a Socrates figure, fostering dialectical difficulty, curiosity and puzzlement in his manner of storytelling. But it will also emphasize a deeper complexity: Conrad importantly modifies his Marlovian Socrates from the familiar philosophical model in order to recast the search for truth on his own artistic terms. For Socrates famously rejected the poets or imaginative writers - their attachment to particularity, their fostering of passion, their defence of the human - but these turn out to be central features of Marlow's narrative activity. Indeed, Conrad's inversion of what is valued in the search for truth, conveyed in the playful guise of the Classical allusion, calls up the ancient quarrel between the philosophers and the poets, a quarrel implicit in Conrad's artistic credo as early as the Preface to The Nigger of the 'Narcissus" (1897) where hebegins by opposing his artistic approach to truth to that of the "thinker" or the "scientist." In Chance, he again takes up this gauntlet. Thus, while the allusions to Socrates signal a search for truth and dialectical activity to that end, the truths offered are found not in abstract ideas, but in the experience of individuals and in the affective sympathies and solidarities between them.Treating Conrad's fiction as dialectical, and in the service of humanistic ends, is not new. Analyses of narrative method by Jeremy Hawthorn and Jakob Lothe reveal the intricacy and deliberateness of Conrad's art, and Richard Ambrosini's bold and poignant study, Conrad's Fiction as Critical Discourse, show how Conrad's narrative explorations were informed by a consistent integrity of vision. Conrad's classical debt, on the other hand, has been pursued since Eloise Knapp Hay's classic work of Aristotelian political analysis and Lilian Feder's essay on Virgil and "Heart of Darkness," recently further extended by Terence Bowers. Even more recently, Alexia Hannis has analyzed Conrad's debt to Aristotle. But considering how both of these aspects of Conrad's art come together in Chance helps us see the philosophical engagement and depth of his artistic vision. Of course, this is not to deny that the novel also engaged the literary genres and issues of its time, as many helpful studies have variously illuminated,1 but only to suggest that it participates equally in an even more enduring conversation.The succinct ease of the novel's allusion to Socrates reminds us of what would have been obvious to readers in 1913 when the Classics were a constitutive part of British and European education, including Conrad's. Because of familial and political upheavals and personal illhealth, Conrad was privately tutored as well as formally schooled. …
马洛、苏格拉底和一场古老的偶然争吵
《偶然》的特点之一——除了其叙事的复杂性之外,许多关于这部小说的评论文章都将其作为出发点——是它对苏格拉底形象的惊人引用。他在第一章中被提到了不止一次,而是两次,第一次是作为一个外表酷似船主的人,然后又作为一个性情上与船主直率的修辞方式形成对比的人。然后船主突然从故事中消失了,古典典故很容易被遗忘,或者被当作是早在小说其余部分之前写的一个尴尬章节的一个偶然细节。正如康拉德自己在给平克的一封信中对这一章所说的:“它不属于那本小说——而是属于其他小说,我猜现在再也写不出来了”(CL5 229)。然而,我们不应该太快地忽略这一章对苏格拉底的引用,他是西方哲学传统的象征。因为苏格拉底“令人恼怒”的谈话方式继续在随后的令人恼怒的叙述中回响,他的回声在转瞬即逝的船主身上发现的较少,而在引入典故的声音中发现的更多,这个家伙“习惯以一种特殊的方式追求一般的想法,在开玩笑和认真之间”(23)——也就是说,在马洛自己身上。本文认为康拉德将《机会》中的马洛塑造成苏格拉底式的人物,在他讲故事的方式中培养了辩证的困难、好奇心和困惑。但它也将强调更深层次的复杂性:康拉德从熟悉的哲学模型中重要地修改了他的马洛式苏格拉底,以便在他自己的艺术条件下重新寻找真理。因为苏格拉底著名地拒绝诗人或富有想象力的作家——他们对特殊性的依恋,他们对激情的培养,他们对人类的捍卫——但这些最终成为马洛叙事活动的中心特征。的确,康拉德在古典典故的戏谑伪装下,对追求真理的价值进行了颠倒,这让人想起了哲学家和诗人之间古老的争论,早在康拉德的艺术信条中就隐含了这种争论,早在《那喀索斯的黑鬼》(1897)的序言中,他就以反对“思想家”或“科学家”的艺术方法来开始他对真理的艺术方法。在《机遇》中,他再次接受了这一挑战。因此,虽然苏格拉底是一种寻求真理和为此目的而进行辩证活动的暗示,但这些真理并不存在于抽象的概念中,而是存在于个人的经验中,存在于他们之间的情感共鸣和团结中。将康拉德的小说视为辩证的,并为人文主义目的服务,这并不新鲜。杰里米·霍桑和雅各布·洛特对叙事方法的分析揭示了康拉德艺术的复杂性和深思熟虑,理查德·安布罗西尼大胆而深刻的研究《作为批判话语的康拉德小说》揭示了康拉德的叙事探索是如何受到一贯完整的视觉的影响的。另一方面,从埃洛伊丝·克纳普·海的亚里士多德政治分析的经典著作和莉莲·费德关于维吉尔和《黑暗之心》的文章(最近由特伦斯·鲍尔斯进一步扩展)开始,康拉德的古典债务就一直在追求。最近,Alexia Hannis分析了康拉德欠亚里士多德的债。但考虑到康拉德艺术的这两个方面是如何在《机遇》中融合在一起的,有助于我们看到他艺术视野的哲学参与和深度。当然,正如许多有益的研究所阐明的那样,这并不否认这部小说也涉及了当时的文学流派和问题,但这只是表明,它同样参与了一场更持久的对话。这部小说对苏格拉底的暗示简洁明了,这让我们想起了1913年,古典文学是英国和欧洲教育的组成部分,包括康拉德的教育,这对读者来说是显而易见的。由于家庭和政治动荡以及个人健康状况不佳,康拉德在接受正规教育的同时,也接受了私人辅导。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信