How U.S. Agriculture Will Fare Under the USMCA and Retaliatory Tariffs

M. Chepeliev, W. Tyner, Dominique van der Mensbrugghe
{"title":"How U.S. Agriculture Will Fare Under the USMCA and Retaliatory Tariffs","authors":"M. Chepeliev, W. Tyner, Dominique van der Mensbrugghe","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3317063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A hallmark of the Trump Administration has been to reverse the post-World War II consensus on lowering of trade barriers and a commitment towards multilateral free trade, towards a more protectionist and perhaps mercantilist position vis-A -vis trade policy. One of the Administration's first actions in this regard was the decision to leave the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement, followed thereafter by raising tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. President Trump left no doubt where he stood on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which he often stated was the \"worst trade deal maybe ever signed anywhere\". The administration's actions on trade are likely to have significant implications for U.S. farmers as these actions target three of the largest markets for U.S. agricultural exports ”Canada, China and Mexico accounting\" for some 44% of U.S. agricultural exports representing an average of $63 billion from 2013 to 2015.","PeriodicalId":233044,"journal":{"name":"AgriSciRN: Food Policy in North America (Sub-Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AgriSciRN: Food Policy in North America (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3317063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

A hallmark of the Trump Administration has been to reverse the post-World War II consensus on lowering of trade barriers and a commitment towards multilateral free trade, towards a more protectionist and perhaps mercantilist position vis-A -vis trade policy. One of the Administration's first actions in this regard was the decision to leave the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement, followed thereafter by raising tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. President Trump left no doubt where he stood on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which he often stated was the "worst trade deal maybe ever signed anywhere". The administration's actions on trade are likely to have significant implications for U.S. farmers as these actions target three of the largest markets for U.S. agricultural exports ”Canada, China and Mexico accounting" for some 44% of U.S. agricultural exports representing an average of $63 billion from 2013 to 2015.
在美墨加贸易协定和报复性关税下,美国农业将如何发展
特朗普政府的一个特点是扭转了二战后关于降低贸易壁垒和致力于多边自由贸易的共识,在贸易政策方面采取了更具保护主义、甚至重商主义的立场。本届政府在这方面采取的首批行动之一是决定退出《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》(TPP),随后又提高了钢铁和铝进口关税。特朗普总统毫不怀疑他对北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA)的立场,他经常说这是“可能在任何地方签署的最糟糕的贸易协定”。特朗普政府的贸易行动可能会对美国农民产生重大影响,因为这些行动针对的是美国农产品出口的三个最大市场——加拿大、中国和墨西哥,它们占美国农产品出口的44%左右,从2013年到2015年,平均出口额为630亿美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信