The Ovaherero and Nama Peoples v. Germany - Declaration of Matthias Goldmann before the SDNY Court

Matthias Goldmann
{"title":"The Ovaherero and Nama Peoples v. Germany - Declaration of Matthias Goldmann before the SDNY Court","authors":"Matthias Goldmann","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3169852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This declaration was filed before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in case Civ. No. 17-0062 (Ovaherero and Nama peoples et al. v. Germany). Based on archival research, the declaration provides estimates of the financial benefits of Germany derived from the suppression of the Ovaherero and Nama, and specifically from the confiscations of property belonging to the indigenous population as well as their subjection to forced labor during and after the 1904 genocide. Further, the declaration argues that the respective actions of Germany violated international law at the time. When the Germans arrived in what is today Namibia, they did not find a terra nullius that could have been occupied, but entered into treaty relationships with the indigenous tribes exercising sovereign control over their territories at the time. Moreover, at the turn of the 20th century, international law knew a minimum standard of humane treatment, which the German government violated by its acts before, during and after the 1904 uprising.","PeriodicalId":280811,"journal":{"name":"Indigenous Nations & Peoples Law eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indigenous Nations & Peoples Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3169852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This declaration was filed before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in case Civ. No. 17-0062 (Ovaherero and Nama peoples et al. v. Germany). Based on archival research, the declaration provides estimates of the financial benefits of Germany derived from the suppression of the Ovaherero and Nama, and specifically from the confiscations of property belonging to the indigenous population as well as their subjection to forced labor during and after the 1904 genocide. Further, the declaration argues that the respective actions of Germany violated international law at the time. When the Germans arrived in what is today Namibia, they did not find a terra nullius that could have been occupied, but entered into treaty relationships with the indigenous tribes exercising sovereign control over their territories at the time. Moreover, at the turn of the 20th century, international law knew a minimum standard of humane treatment, which the German government violated by its acts before, during and after the 1904 uprising.
奥瓦赫雷罗和纳马人民诉德国-马蒂亚斯·戈德曼在纽约法院的声明
这份声明是在美国纽约南区地方法院提交的,以防民事诉讼。第17-0062号(Ovaherero和Nama等人诉德国)。在档案研究的基础上,宣言提供了对德国在镇压奥瓦赫列罗和纳马人,特别是在1904年种族灭绝期间和之后没收土著居民财产以及强迫他们劳动所获得的经济利益的估计。此外,宣言还认为,德国各自的行动违反了当时的国际法。当德国人到达今天的纳米比亚时,他们没有找到一个可以占领的无主地,而是与当时对其领土行使主权控制的土著部落建立了条约关系。此外,在20世纪之交,国际法知道人道待遇的最低标准,而德国政府在1904年起义之前、期间和之后的行为违反了这一标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信