Drawing Imperial Lines: Sovereignty and Tacitus’ Germanicus

R. Alston
{"title":"Drawing Imperial Lines: Sovereignty and Tacitus’ Germanicus","authors":"R. Alston","doi":"10.30687/lexis/2724-1564/2021/02/006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay focuses on Germanicus’ performance of sovereign power in Tacitus’ Annales 1-2. That power is seen in the differentiation of citizen from non-citizen and Roman territory from non-Roman territory. Roman violence in Germany contrasts with Germanicus in the East. There he recognised a shared history and community. Sovereign power required a recognition of the sovereign by the citizen and of the citizen by the sovereign. An individual’s membership and a territory’s place within the Roman Empire depended not on innate characteristics but political negotiation. Ancient political geographies gave primacy to the political rather than the territorial in determining citizenship.","PeriodicalId":273833,"journal":{"name":"Num. 39 (n.s.) – Dicembre 2021 – Fasc. 2","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Num. 39 (n.s.) – Dicembre 2021 – Fasc. 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30687/lexis/2724-1564/2021/02/006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay focuses on Germanicus’ performance of sovereign power in Tacitus’ Annales 1-2. That power is seen in the differentiation of citizen from non-citizen and Roman territory from non-Roman territory. Roman violence in Germany contrasts with Germanicus in the East. There he recognised a shared history and community. Sovereign power required a recognition of the sovereign by the citizen and of the citizen by the sovereign. An individual’s membership and a territory’s place within the Roman Empire depended not on innate characteristics but political negotiation. Ancient political geographies gave primacy to the political rather than the territorial in determining citizenship.
绘制帝国的界线:主权与塔西佗的《日耳曼icus》
本文主要关注塔西佗《年历》1-2中日耳曼库斯对主权权力的表现。这种权力体现在公民与非公民,罗马领土与非罗马领土的区别上。罗马人在日耳曼的暴力与东方的日耳曼人的暴力形成鲜明对比。在那里,他认识到了一个共同的历史和社区。主权权力要求公民承认君主,公民承认君主。一个人在罗马帝国的成员资格和领土地位不是取决于天生的特征,而是取决于政治谈判。古代政治地理学在决定公民身份时,优先考虑的是政治而不是领土。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信