Why would you do that? predicting the uses and gratifications behind smartphone-usage behaviors

Alexis Hiniker, Shwetak N. Patel, Tadayoshi Kohno, J. Kientz
{"title":"Why would you do that? predicting the uses and gratifications behind smartphone-usage behaviors","authors":"Alexis Hiniker, Shwetak N. Patel, Tadayoshi Kohno, J. Kientz","doi":"10.1145/2971648.2971762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While people often use smartphones to achieve specific goals, at other times they use them out of habit or to pass the time. Uses and Gratifications Theory explains that users' motivations for engaging with technology can be divided into instrumental and ritualistic purposes. Instrumental uses of technology are goal-directed and purposeful, while ritualistic uses are habitual and diversionary. In this paper, we provide an empirical account of the nature of instrumental vs. ritualistic use of smartphones based on data collected from 43 Android users over 2 weeks through logging application use and collecting ESM survey data about the purpose of use. We describe the phone-use behaviors users exhibit when seeking instrumental and ritualistic gratifications, and we develop a classification scheme for predicting ritualistic vs. instrumental use with an accuracy of 77% for a general model, increasing to more than 97% with a sliding confidence threshold. We discuss how such a model might be used to improve the experience of smartphone users in application areas such as recommender systems and social media.","PeriodicalId":303792,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

While people often use smartphones to achieve specific goals, at other times they use them out of habit or to pass the time. Uses and Gratifications Theory explains that users' motivations for engaging with technology can be divided into instrumental and ritualistic purposes. Instrumental uses of technology are goal-directed and purposeful, while ritualistic uses are habitual and diversionary. In this paper, we provide an empirical account of the nature of instrumental vs. ritualistic use of smartphones based on data collected from 43 Android users over 2 weeks through logging application use and collecting ESM survey data about the purpose of use. We describe the phone-use behaviors users exhibit when seeking instrumental and ritualistic gratifications, and we develop a classification scheme for predicting ritualistic vs. instrumental use with an accuracy of 77% for a general model, increasing to more than 97% with a sliding confidence threshold. We discuss how such a model might be used to improve the experience of smartphone users in application areas such as recommender systems and social media.
你为什么要这么做?预测智能手机使用行为背后的用途和满足感
虽然人们经常使用智能手机来实现特定的目标,但在其他时候,他们使用智能手机是出于习惯或打发时间。使用与满足理论解释说,用户使用技术的动机可以分为工具性目的和仪式性目的。技术的工具性使用是目标导向的和有目的的,而仪式性使用是习惯性的和分散的。在本文中,我们根据从43名Android用户收集的数据,通过记录应用程序使用情况和收集关于使用目的的ESM调查数据,对智能手机的工具性和仪式性使用的本质进行了实证分析。我们描述了用户在寻求工具和仪式性满足时表现出的手机使用行为,并开发了一种分类方案,用于预测仪式性和工具性使用,一般模型的准确率为77%,在滑动置信阈值下增加到97%以上。我们讨论了如何使用这样的模型来改善智能手机用户在推荐系统和社交媒体等应用领域的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信