Traditions of Western Rhetoric and Daesoon Jinrihoe: Prolegomena to Further Investigations

B. Fehler
{"title":"Traditions of Western Rhetoric and Daesoon Jinrihoe: Prolegomena to Further Investigations","authors":"B. Fehler","doi":"10.25050/jdtrea.2022.1.2.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Applying the long and distinguished heritage of rhetorical theory to any sacred text, such The Canonical Scripture of Daesoon Jinrihoe, could fill many volumes of many books. This study, then, will provide some suggestive prolegomena for directions rhetorical criticism of the Scripture can take, now and in future research. This study will, further, make necessarily broad strokes in order to familiarize audiences and scholars of new Korean religions, and Eastern thought generally, with Western, both ancient and more modern, modes of rhetorical thought. As rhetorical criticism is increasingly embraced by Western religious scholarship, and as comparative religious studies remain an important dimension of textual scholarship, this article will contribute to both areas by presenting perhaps the first rhetorical-critical approach to the sacred scriptures of Daesoon Jinrihoe. When the new English translation of the Scriptures becomes available in the West, general and scholarly readers will be interested to find parallels and departures with religious and critical traditions with which they are already familiar (in this case, early American Protestant Calvinism). This study will make contributions, then, to the areas of rhetorical-religious criticism, comparative East-West presentations of nature within scriptural contexts, and establishment of grounds for further comparative investigations of Western traditions and Daesoon Jinrihoe.","PeriodicalId":259212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25050/jdtrea.2022.1.2.133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Applying the long and distinguished heritage of rhetorical theory to any sacred text, such The Canonical Scripture of Daesoon Jinrihoe, could fill many volumes of many books. This study, then, will provide some suggestive prolegomena for directions rhetorical criticism of the Scripture can take, now and in future research. This study will, further, make necessarily broad strokes in order to familiarize audiences and scholars of new Korean religions, and Eastern thought generally, with Western, both ancient and more modern, modes of rhetorical thought. As rhetorical criticism is increasingly embraced by Western religious scholarship, and as comparative religious studies remain an important dimension of textual scholarship, this article will contribute to both areas by presenting perhaps the first rhetorical-critical approach to the sacred scriptures of Daesoon Jinrihoe. When the new English translation of the Scriptures becomes available in the West, general and scholarly readers will be interested to find parallels and departures with religious and critical traditions with which they are already familiar (in this case, early American Protestant Calvinism). This study will make contributions, then, to the areas of rhetorical-religious criticism, comparative East-West presentations of nature within scriptural contexts, and establishment of grounds for further comparative investigations of Western traditions and Daesoon Jinrihoe.
西方修辞学传统与宣真日会:进一步研究的前瞻
将修辞学理论的悠久而杰出的遗产应用于任何神圣的文本,如《大宣真日会正典》,可以填满许多卷书。因此,本研究将为现在和将来的研究提供一些启发性的预兆,以指导圣经修辞批评的方向。此外,这项研究还将进行必要的广泛研究,以便使研究新朝鲜宗教和东方思想的听众和学者熟悉西方的古代和现代修辞思维模式。由于修辞学批评越来越被西方宗教学者所接受,而比较宗教研究仍然是文本研究的一个重要方面,本文将通过对大宣真理会的神圣经文提出可能是第一个修辞学批评方法,对这两个领域做出贡献。当《圣经》的新英文译本在西方可用时,普通和学术的读者将有兴趣找到与他们已经熟悉的宗教和批评传统(在这种情况下,是早期美国新教加尔文主义)的相似之处和背离。因此,本研究将对修辞学-宗教批评、在圣经背景下比较东西方自然呈现,以及为进一步比较西方传统和大宣真理会的研究奠定基础等领域做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信