Students’ Behaviours in using Learning Resources in Higher Education: How do behaviours reflect success in Programming Education?

T. Mai, M. Crane, Marija Bezbradica
{"title":"Students’ Behaviours in using Learning Resources in Higher Education: How do behaviours reflect success in Programming Education?","authors":"T. Mai, M. Crane, Marija Bezbradica","doi":"10.4995/head21.2021.12939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Programming education traditionally has been an important part of Information Technology-related degrees but, more recently, it is also becoming essential in many STEM domains as well. Despite this, drop-out rates in programming courses in higher education institutions are considerable and cannot be ignored. At the same time, analysing learning behaviours has been reported to be an effective way to support the improvement of teaching and learning quality. This article aims to deliver an in-depth analysis of students’ learning behaviours when using course material items. We analyse an introductory programming course at a University in Dublin. The dataset is extracted from automatically logged learning data from a bespoke online learning system. The analysis makes use of the power of Principal Component Analysis and Random Matrix Theory to reduce dimensionality in, and to extract information from, the data, verifying the results with rigorous statistical tests. Overall, we found that all the students follow a common learning pattern in accessing all given learning items. However, there is a noticeable difference between higher and lower-performing cohorts of students when using practical and theoretical learning items. The high performing students have been consistently active in practice during the study progress. On the other hand, the students who failed the exam have more recorded activities in reading lecture notes and appear to become discouraged and unmotivated from the practical activities, especially in the later stage of the semester.","PeriodicalId":169443,"journal":{"name":"7th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'21)","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"7th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'21)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/head21.2021.12939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Programming education traditionally has been an important part of Information Technology-related degrees but, more recently, it is also becoming essential in many STEM domains as well. Despite this, drop-out rates in programming courses in higher education institutions are considerable and cannot be ignored. At the same time, analysing learning behaviours has been reported to be an effective way to support the improvement of teaching and learning quality. This article aims to deliver an in-depth analysis of students’ learning behaviours when using course material items. We analyse an introductory programming course at a University in Dublin. The dataset is extracted from automatically logged learning data from a bespoke online learning system. The analysis makes use of the power of Principal Component Analysis and Random Matrix Theory to reduce dimensionality in, and to extract information from, the data, verifying the results with rigorous statistical tests. Overall, we found that all the students follow a common learning pattern in accessing all given learning items. However, there is a noticeable difference between higher and lower-performing cohorts of students when using practical and theoretical learning items. The high performing students have been consistently active in practice during the study progress. On the other hand, the students who failed the exam have more recorded activities in reading lecture notes and appear to become discouraged and unmotivated from the practical activities, especially in the later stage of the semester.
高等教育中学生使用学习资源的行为:行为如何反映编程教育的成功?
编程教育传统上一直是信息技术相关学位的重要组成部分,但最近,它在许多STEM领域也变得至关重要。尽管如此,高等教育机构编程课程的辍学率相当高,不容忽视。同时,分析学习行为被认为是提高教与学质量的有效途径。本文旨在深入分析学生在使用课程材料项目时的学习行为。我们分析了都柏林一所大学的编程入门课程。数据集是从定制的在线学习系统中自动记录的学习数据中提取的。该分析利用主成分分析和随机矩阵理论的力量对数据进行降维,并从中提取信息,并通过严格的统计检验来验证结果。总的来说,我们发现所有的学生都遵循一个共同的学习模式来访问所有给定的学习项目。然而,在使用实践和理论学习项目时,表现较好的学生和表现较差的学生之间存在显著差异。在学习过程中,表现优异的学生在实践中始终表现积极。另一方面,考试不及格的学生在阅读课堂笔记方面有更多的记录活动,并且在实践活动中显得气馁和缺乏动力,特别是在学期的后期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信