Don't Shut Up: Why Teachers Must Defend the First Amendment in Secondary Schools

James R. Moore
{"title":"Don't Shut Up: Why Teachers Must Defend the First Amendment in Secondary Schools","authors":"James R. Moore","doi":"10.46303/JCVE.01.02.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Don’t Shut Up: Why Teachers Must Defend the First Amendment in Secondary Schools \nAbstract \nSeveral recent judicial decisions and numerous reports from scholars, educators, legal experts, journalists, and advocacy groups suggest that the First Amendment protection of freedom of expression is being unconstitutionally abridged in American universities and secondary schools. Freedom of expression for university and secondary school students is essential to securing individual rights, protecting liberty, enhancing civic participation, and is a safeguard against government infringement on freedom of thought and expression. The First Amendment, along with other rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights, is the crucial underpinning of a pluralistic democracy. However, many universities and secondary schools have sought to restrict freedom of expression by establishing speech codes, safe zones, and institutional policies that prohibit and punish speech that is deemed controversial, hateful, radical, or offensive. These speech codes are designed to foster tolerance, respect, and sensitivity for individuals and groups; while this is a worthy goal, it must be achieved without violating the First Amendment. Teachers must resist unconstitutional attempts at censorship and instruct their students that the primary purpose of the First Amendment is to protect controversial, offensive, and radical speech. This article will examine the attacks on free speech and discuss how teachers can defend the First Amendment. \n ","PeriodicalId":142332,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Culture and Values in Education","volume":"1973 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Culture and Values in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46303/JCVE.01.02.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Don’t Shut Up: Why Teachers Must Defend the First Amendment in Secondary Schools Abstract Several recent judicial decisions and numerous reports from scholars, educators, legal experts, journalists, and advocacy groups suggest that the First Amendment protection of freedom of expression is being unconstitutionally abridged in American universities and secondary schools. Freedom of expression for university and secondary school students is essential to securing individual rights, protecting liberty, enhancing civic participation, and is a safeguard against government infringement on freedom of thought and expression. The First Amendment, along with other rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights, is the crucial underpinning of a pluralistic democracy. However, many universities and secondary schools have sought to restrict freedom of expression by establishing speech codes, safe zones, and institutional policies that prohibit and punish speech that is deemed controversial, hateful, radical, or offensive. These speech codes are designed to foster tolerance, respect, and sensitivity for individuals and groups; while this is a worthy goal, it must be achieved without violating the First Amendment. Teachers must resist unconstitutional attempts at censorship and instruct their students that the primary purpose of the First Amendment is to protect controversial, offensive, and radical speech. This article will examine the attacks on free speech and discuss how teachers can defend the First Amendment.  
不要闭嘴:为什么教师必须在中学捍卫第一修正案
最近的几项司法判决以及来自学者、教育工作者、法律专家、记者和倡导团体的大量报告表明,第一修正案对言论自由的保护在美国大学和中学中被违宪地削弱了。大学生和中学生的言论自由是保障个人权利、保护自由、加强公民参与的必要条件,也是防止政府侵犯思想和言论自由的保障。《第一修正案》与《权利法案》所载的其他权利一起,是多元化民主的关键基础。然而,许多大学和中学试图通过建立言论规范、安全区和制度性政策来限制言论自由,禁止和惩罚被视为有争议的、仇恨的、激进的或冒犯性的言论。这些语言代码旨在培养对个人和群体的宽容、尊重和敏感;虽然这是一个有价值的目标,但必须在不违反第一修正案的情况下实现。教师必须抵制违宪的审查企图,并教导学生,第一修正案的主要目的是保护有争议的、攻击性的和激进的言论。本文将研究对言论自由的攻击,并讨论教师如何捍卫第一修正案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信